H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:30 UTC

Julia Goerges vs Alizé Cornet H2H: 5-1

Julia Goerges holds a 5–1 lead over Alizé Cornet in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 3–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Alizé Cornet won the 2018 Australian Open second round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Julia Goerges
GER Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Alizé Cornet
FRA Age 36 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 18, 2018* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Alizé Cornet #42 6-4 6-3 Julia Goerges #12 Match data
Apr 21, 2016* Stuttgart WTA 500 R32 Clay Julia Goerges #57 6-4 6-0 Alizé Cornet #48 Match data
Sep 30, 2015* Wuhan WTA 1000 R64 Hard Julia Goerges #56 6-3 6-3 Alizé Cornet #34 Match data
Aug 25, 2011* Dallas WTA 250 R32 Hard Julia Goerges #20 0-6 6-4 6-0 Alizé Cornet #92 Match data
Jan 7, 2011* Auckland WTA 250 R16 Hard Julia Goerges #40 6-2 6-4 Alizé Cornet #79 Match data
Jul 24, 2010* Bad Gastein WTA 250 SF Clay Julia Goerges #65 6-1 6-4 Alizé Cornet #81 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Julia Goerges #45 #9 3,980 1,940 304 249 55.0% 0 0 1 2 4 7
Alizé Cornet #460 #11 3,256 1,884 376 358 51.2% 0 0 0 2 4 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Julia Goerges Alizé Cornet
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
2007 4–5 44.4% #126 1,543 0 0 2005 1–1 50.0% #317 1,515 0 0
2008 6–7 46.2% #108 1,557 0 0 2006 1–2 33.3% #196 1,510 0 0
2009 9–11 45.0% #77 1,588 0 0 2007 8–9 47.1% #55 1,570 0 0
2010 29–22 56.9% #40 1,760 0 1 2008 34–21 61.8% #16 1,775 0 1
2011 36–24 60.0% #21 1,772 0 2 2009 20–24 45.5% #49 1,660 0 1
2012 34–25 57.6% #18 1,751 0 2 2010 17–20 45.9% #78 1,610 0 1
2013 14–27 34.1% #72 1,535 0 2 2011 10–17 37.0% #88 1,560 0 1
2014 15–18 45.5% #74 1,596 0 2 2012 21–19 52.5% #44 1,637 0 2
2015 17–20 45.9% #50 1,612 0 2 2013 35–27 56.5% #27 1,730 0 3
2016 22–20 52.4% #53 1,671 0 2 2014 37–24 60.7% #19 1,789 0 4
2017 42–22 65.6% #14 1,880 0 4 2015 23–26 46.9% #43 1,632 0 4
2018 44–22 66.7% #14 1,861 0 6 2016 20–19 51.3% #41 1,702 0 5
2019 26–20 56.5% #28 1,799 0 7 2017 23–22 51.1% #38 1,750 0 5
2020 6–6 50.0% #45 1,761 0 7 2018 22–23 48.9% #45 1,693 0 6
— — — — — — — 2019 25–22 53.2% #59 1,683 0 6
— — — — — — — 2020 13–9 59.1% #53 1,763 0 6
— — — — — — — 2021 24–23 51.1% #61 1,744 0 6
— — — — — — — 2022 26–23 53.1% #36 1,755 0 6
— — — — — — — 2023 15–19 44.1% #117 1,684 0 6
— — — — — — — 2024 1–7 12.5% #391 1,613 0 6
— — — — — — — 2025 0–1 0.0% #460 1,558 0 6