H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Andrea Petkovic H2H: 0-4
Andrea Petkovic holds a 4–0 lead over Julia Goerges in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Andrea Petkovic leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrea Petkovic won the 2019 Linz fourth round 7-6(2) 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2019* | Linz | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Andrea Petkovic | 7-6(2) 6-0 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Oct 11, 2018* | Linz | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Andrea Petkovic | 1-6 7-5 6-4 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Aug 19, 2015* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Andrea Petkovic | 6-4 6-2 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Jun 14, 2013* | Nuremberg | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Andrea Petkovic | 6-1 7-5 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Andrea Petkovic | #139 | #9 | 4,640 | 1,990 | 273 | 225 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Andrea Petkovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #55 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #10 | 1,975 | 0 | 2 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,857 | 0 | 2 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #43 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,826 | 0 | 5 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #24 | 1,685 | 0 | 6 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,702 | 0 | 6 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2017 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #99 | 1,631 | 0 | 6 |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | 2018 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,700 | 0 | 6 |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | 2019 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #78 | 1,712 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,697 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,730 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #139 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 |