H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Kirsten Flipkens H2H: 2-0
Julia Goerges holds a 2–0 lead over Kirsten Flipkens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2013 Stuttgart third round 6-2 2-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 40
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2013* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Julia Goerges | 6-2 2-1 (ret.) | Kirsten Flipkens | Match data |
| Oct 13, 2012* | Linz | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Julia Goerges | 1-6 6-2 6-3 | Kirsten Flipkens | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Kirsten Flipkens | #531 | #13 | 2,961 | 1,829 | 198 | 221 | 47.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Kirsten Flipkens | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #380 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #202 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #104 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #111 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #81 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #192 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 13–4 | 76.5% | #54 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #20 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #45 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #85 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #65 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #74 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #47 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #71 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #86 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #311 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,685 | 0 | 1 |