H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Lara Arruabarrena H2H: 3-0
Julia Goerges holds a 3–0 lead over Lara Arruabarrena in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2018 Madrid third round 2-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 34
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2018* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Julia Goerges | 2-6 6-4 6-2 | Lara Arruabarrena | Match data |
| Jun 22, 2017* | Mallorca | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Julia Goerges | 6-1 6-2 | Lara Arruabarrena | Match data |
| Sep 24, 2015* | Seoul | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-1 6-4 | Lara Arruabarrena | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Lara Arruabarrena | #1,062 | #52 | 1,083 | 1,722 | 99 | 120 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Lara Arruabarrena | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #170 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #79 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #102 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #88 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #86 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #66 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #84 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #82 | 1,573 | 0 | 2 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #155 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #220 | 1,508 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |