H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Maria Sharapova H2H: 0-4
Maria Sharapova holds a 4–0 lead over Julia Goerges in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Maria Sharapova leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Maria Sharapova won the 2014 Indian Wells second round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2014* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Maria Sharapova | 6-1 6-4 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Sep 30, 2011* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Maria Sharapova | 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Jan 23, 2011* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Maria Sharapova | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| May 22, 2010* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | QF | Clay | Maria Sharapova | 7-6(2) 6-1 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Maria Sharapova | #373 | #1 | 10,690 | 2,238 | 596 | 174 | 77.4% | 5 | 14 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 36 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Maria Sharapova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #188 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #32 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 55–16 | 77.5% | #4 | 2,063 | 1 | 7 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #4 | 2,068 | 1 | 10 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 59–10 | 85.5% | #2 | 2,210 | 2 | 15 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 40–12 | 76.9% | #5 | 2,113 | 2 | 16 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 31–6 | 83.8% | #9 | 2,098 | 3 | 19 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 31–9 | 77.5% | #14 | 2,050 | 3 | 20 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 33–11 | 75.0% | #18 | 1,981 | 3 | 22 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 43–13 | 76.8% | #4 | 1,993 | 3 | 24 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 55–10 | 84.6% | #2 | 2,155 | 4 | 27 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2013 | 37–8 | 82.2% | #4 | 2,136 | 4 | 29 |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | 2014 | 50–13 | 79.4% | #2 | 2,093 | 5 | 33 |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 35–10 | 77.8% | #4 | 2,044 | 5 | 35 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #91 | 2,049 | 5 | 35 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 16–7 | 69.6% | #61 | 1,976 | 5 | 36 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #29 | 1,929 | 5 | 36 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #133 | 1,858 | 5 | 36 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,820 | 5 | 36 |