H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Julia Goerges vs Svetlana Kuznetsova H2H: 3-4

Svetlana Kuznetsova holds a 4–3 lead over Julia Goerges in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Svetlana Kuznetsova leads 4–3 on hard courts. Most recently, Svetlana Kuznetsova won the 2016 Doha second round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Julia Goerges
GER Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Svetlana Kuznetsova
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 23, 2016* Doha WTA 1000 R64 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #21 6-3 6-3 Julia Goerges #53 Match data
Feb 17, 2016* Dubai WTA 1000 R32 Hard Julia Goerges #54 6-0 6-1 Svetlana Kuznetsova #18 Match data
Jan 31, 2014* Pattaya WTA 250 R16 Hard Julia Goerges #102 (def.) Svetlana Kuznetsova #29 Match data
Jan 10, 2013* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #85 3-6 6-3 6-3 Julia Goerges #18 Match data
Feb 23, 2012* Dubai WTA 500 R32 Hard Julia Goerges #19 2-6 7-6(2) 6-4 Svetlana Kuznetsova #27 Match data
Sep 2, 2009* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #6 6-3 6-2 Julia Goerges #92 Match data
Mar 2, 2007* Doha WTA 500 R16 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #5 7-5 6-1 Julia Goerges #414 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Julia Goerges #45 #9 3,980 1,940 304 249 55.0% 0 0 1 2 4 7
Svetlana Kuznetsova #1,203 #2 6,191 2,097 580 319 64.5% 2 2 0 10 4 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Julia Goerges Svetlana Kuznetsova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
2007 4–5 44.4% #126 1,543 0 0 2001 2–2 50.0% #266 1,519 0 0
2008 6–7 46.2% #108 1,557 0 0 2002 22–9 71.0% #43 1,744 0 2
2009 9–11 45.0% #77 1,588 0 0 2003 22–16 57.9% #35 1,819 0 2
2010 29–22 56.9% #40 1,760 0 1 2004 54–19 74.0% #5 2,026 1 5
2011 36–24 60.0% #21 1,772 0 2 2005 29–17 63.0% #18 1,868 1 5
2012 34–25 57.6% #18 1,751 0 2 2006 61–20 75.3% #4 2,039 1 8
2013 14–27 34.1% #72 1,535 0 2 2007 51–20 71.8% #2 1,994 1 9
2014 15–18 45.5% #74 1,596 0 2 2008 41–20 67.2% #8 1,934 1 9
2015 17–20 45.9% #50 1,612 0 2 2009 41–16 71.9% #3 1,981 2 12
2016 22–20 52.4% #53 1,671 0 2 2010 26–16 61.9% #27 1,884 2 13
2017 42–22 65.6% #14 1,880 0 4 2011 31–19 62.0% #19 1,804 2 13
2018 44–22 66.7% #14 1,861 0 6 2012 13–12 52.0% #71 1,776 2 13
2019 26–20 56.5% #28 1,799 0 7 2013 29–18 61.7% #21 1,827 2 13
2020 6–6 50.0% #45 1,761 0 7 2014 27–18 60.0% #27 1,845 2 14
— — — — — — — 2015 26–19 57.8% #25 1,836 2 15
— — — — — — — 2016 40–20 66.7% #9 1,917 2 17
— — — — — — — 2017 32–17 65.3% #12 1,826 2 17
— — — — — — — 2018 6–12 33.3% #106 1,709 2 18
— — — — — — — 2019 14–13 51.9% #53 1,772 2 18
— — — — — — — 2020 8–7 53.3% #36 1,799 2 18
— — — — — — — 2021 5–9 35.7% #109 1,726 2 18