H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Timea Bacsinszky H2H: 1-2
Timea Bacsinszky holds a 2–1 lead over Julia Goerges in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 1–0 on clay, while Timea Bacsinszky leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Timea Bacsinszky won the 2015 Wimbledon first round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 37
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2015* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Timea Bacsinszky | 6-2 7-5 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Oct 6, 2010* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Timea Bacsinszky | 3-6 6-4 7-6(4) | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Jul 25, 2010* | Bad Gastein | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Julia Goerges | 6-1 6-4 | Timea Bacsinszky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Timea Bacsinszky | #941 | #9 | 3,157 | 1,933 | 161 | 137 | 54.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Timea Bacsinszky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #54 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #53 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #50 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #247 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #48 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 37–14 | 72.5% | #12 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2016 | 32–17 | 65.3% | #15 | 1,777 | 0 | 4 |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | 2017 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #39 | 1,816 | 0 | 4 |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | 2018 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #191 | 1,725 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #139 | 1,630 | 0 | 4 |