H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Yaroslava Shvedova H2H: 0-1
Yaroslava Shvedova holds a 1–0 lead over Julia Goerges in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yaroslava Shvedova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Yaroslava Shvedova won the 2016 Wimbledon first round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
KAZ
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2016* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Yaroslava Shvedova | 7-5 6-4 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Yaroslava Shvedova | #1,136 | #25 | 1,860 | 1,751 | 141 | 175 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Yaroslava Shvedova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #292 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #84 | 1,492 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #92 | 1,470 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #204 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #29 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #65 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #67 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2016 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | 2017 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #289 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #434 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |