H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Julia Grabher vs Cagla Buyukakcay H2H: 1-0
Julia Grabher holds a 1–0 lead over Cagla Buyukakcay in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julia Grabher leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Julia Grabher won the 2023 Rabat fourth round 6-1 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 30
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
TUR
Age 36
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2023* | Rabat | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Julia Grabher | 6-1 7-6(4) | Cagla Buyukakcay | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Grabher | #116 | #54 | 1,004 | 1,680 | 19 | 37 | 33.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cagla Buyukakcay | #373 | #60 | 980 | 1,613 | 22 | 52 | 29.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Julia Grabher | Cagla Buyukakcay | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #158 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #137 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #82 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #126 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #101 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #83 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #160 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2025 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #95 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2026 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #116 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #382 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 |