H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Junri Namigata vs Luksika Kumkhum H2H: 0-1
Luksika Kumkhum holds a 1–0 lead over Junri Namigata in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Luksika Kumkhum leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Luksika Kumkhum won the 2015 Kuala Lumpur third round 6-3 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 44
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
THA
Age 32
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2015* | Kuala Lumpur | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Luksika Kumkhum | 6-3 7-6(4) | Junri Namigata | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Junri Namigata | #1,159 | #105 | 641 | 1,519 | 3 | 19 | 13.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Luksika Kumkhum | #1,145 | #66 | 884 | 1,656 | 21 | 37 | 36.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Junri Namigata | Luksika Kumkhum | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #116 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #159 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #125 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #66 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #625 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #112 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2011 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #294 | 1,404 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #347 | 1,409 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |