H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kai-Chen Chang vs Akgul Amanmuradova H2H: 0-1
Akgul Amanmuradova holds a 1–0 lead over Kai-Chen Chang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Akgul Amanmuradova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Akgul Amanmuradova won the 2013 Kuala Lumpur third round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
UZB
Age 42
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2013* | Kuala Lumpur | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Akgul Amanmuradova | 6-1 6-3 | Kai-Chen Chang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kai-Chen Chang | #1,233 | #82 | 808 | 1,647 | 32 | 59 | 35.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Akgul Amanmuradova | #1,097 | #50 | 1,031 | 1,631 | 61 | 101 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kai-Chen Chang | Akgul Amanmuradova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #607 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #148 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #86 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #380 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #621 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #197 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #219 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #82 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #401 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #85 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #70 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #114 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #198 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #227 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #375 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #459 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |