H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Kai-Chen Chang vs Casey Dellacqua H2H: 1-0
Kai-Chen Chang holds a 1–0 lead over Casey Dellacqua in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kai-Chen Chang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kai-Chen Chang won the 2012 Osaka fourth round 7-6(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 41
Left-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2012* | Osaka | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Kai-Chen Chang | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Casey Dellacqua | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kai-Chen Chang | #1,233 | #82 | 808 | 1,647 | 32 | 59 | 35.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Casey Dellacqua | #932 | #26 | 1,725 | 1,761 | 79 | 105 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kai-Chen Chang | Casey Dellacqua | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #148 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #86 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #157 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #621 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #53 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1002 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #219 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #227 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #401 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #134 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #101 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #29 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #116 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |