H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kai-Chen Chang vs Elena Baltacha H2H: 0-1
Elena Baltacha holds a 1–0 lead over Kai-Chen Chang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elena Baltacha leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Elena Baltacha won the 2012 Birmingham second round 4-6 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2012* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Elena Baltacha | 4-6 6-4 7-5 | Kai-Chen Chang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kai-Chen Chang | #1,233 | #82 | 808 | 1,647 | 32 | 59 | 35.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Elena Baltacha | #225 | #49 | 1,179 | 1,664 | 47 | 74 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kai-Chen Chang | Elena Baltacha | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #157 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #148 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #86 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #185 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #621 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #129 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #187 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #136 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #219 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #84 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #401 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #51 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #174 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #225 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |