H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kai-Chen Chang vs Jie Zheng H2H: 2-0
Kai-Chen Chang holds a 2–0 lead over Jie Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kai-Chen Chang leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kai-Chen Chang won the 2015 Australian Open first round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Age 43
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2015* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Kai-Chen Chang | 6-1 6-2 | Jie Zheng | Match data |
| Feb 26, 2010* | Kuala Lumpur | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Kai-Chen Chang | 6-2 6-3 | Jie Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kai-Chen Chang | #1,233 | #82 | 808 | 1,647 | 32 | 59 | 35.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jie Zheng | #961 | #15 | 2,745 | 1,898 | 216 | 193 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kai-Chen Chang | Jie Zheng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #84 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #148 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #79 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #86 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #44 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #621 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #33 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 |
| 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 |
| 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 20–10 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,838 | 0 | 3 |
| 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #219 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #35 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 |
| 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #401 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #48 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #26 | 1,658 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,688 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #91 | 1,670 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #962 | 1,648 | 0 | 4 |