H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kai-Chen Chang vs Marion Bartoli H2H: 1-0
Kai-Chen Chang holds a 1–0 lead over Marion Bartoli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kai-Chen Chang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kai-Chen Chang won the 2012 Guangzhou third round 4-3 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2012* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Kai-Chen Chang | 4-3 (ret.) | Marion Bartoli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kai-Chen Chang | #1,233 | #82 | 808 | 1,647 | 32 | 59 | 35.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marion Bartoli | #13 | #7 | 5,160 | 1,996 | 402 | 267 | 60.1% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kai-Chen Chang | Marion Bartoli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #148 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #58 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #86 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #41 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #621 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #37 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 45–28 | 61.6% | #18 | 1,800 | 0 | 3 |
| 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 47–31 | 60.3% | #10 | 1,873 | 0 | 3 |
| 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #219 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #17 | 1,809 | 0 | 3 |
| 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #401 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #11 | 1,882 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 60–26 | 69.8% | #9 | 1,907 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #11 | 1,814 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #13 | 1,808 | 1 | 8 |