H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Kai-Chen Chang vs Mathilde Johansson H2H: 0-1
Mathilde Johansson holds a 1–0 lead over Kai-Chen Chang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mathilde Johansson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mathilde Johansson won the 2013 Pattaya third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2013* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Mathilde Johansson | 6-4 6-3 | Kai-Chen Chang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kai-Chen Chang | #1,233 | #82 | 808 | 1,647 | 32 | 59 | 35.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mathilde Johansson | #235 | #59 | 992 | 1,619 | 44 | 75 | 37.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kai-Chen Chang | Mathilde Johansson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #148 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #86 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #85 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #621 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #77 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #219 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #87 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #401 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #136 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #207 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |