Kai-Chen Chang
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuai Zhang | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jul 27, 2017 | H2H |
| Shuai Peng | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 2, 2017 | H2H |
| Iveta Benesova | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 30, 2012 | H2H |
| Tamarine Tanasugarn | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 10, 2012 | H2H |
| Qiang Wang | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 12, 2017 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Kai-Chen Chang vs Sílvia Soler-Espinosa H2H: 1-0
Kai-Chen Chang holds a 1–0 lead over Sílvia Soler-Espinosa in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kai-Chen Chang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kai-Chen Chang won the 2013 Shenzhen round of 32 4-6 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kai-Chen Chang | 4-6 6-1 6-3 | Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | Match data | Jan 3, 2013* | R32 | Shenzhen | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kai-Chen Chang | #1,233 | #82 | 808 | 1,646 | 32 | 59 | 35.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | #858 | #54 | 1,157 | 1,641 | 56 | 103 | 35.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kai-Chen Chang | Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #148 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #86 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #621 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #167 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #81 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #83 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #82 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #219 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #66 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #401 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #145 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #128 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #225 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #190 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #681 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Kai-Chen Chang | Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 2009 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2009 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2013 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2015 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 25 | 2016 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2 | 10 | 12 | 16.7% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 26 | 2017 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2014 | 5 | 14 | 19 | 26.3% | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 27 | 2018 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 30 | 45 | 75 | 40.0% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | — | 17 | 46 | 63 | 27.0% | 35 | 51 | 86 | 40.7% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 84/91 of Kai-Chen Chang's and 151/159 of Sílvia Soler-Espinosa's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Kai-Chen Chang | Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | 2009 | 9/10 | 1.0 | 4.1 | 64.7% | 59.0% | 43.6% | 58.2% | 54.3% | 53.4% | 47.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 22/24 | 1.6 | 6.8 | 58.9% | 58.6% | 41.8% | 54.0% | 46.2% | 51.7% | 44.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 9/9 | 1.7 | 4.6 | 63.3% | 61.6% | 39.8% | 49.4% | 42.5% | 53.4% | 40.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 18/20 | 1.8 | 5.3 | 59.7% | 62.2% | 41.6% | 43.4% | 47.6% | 54.1% | 43.1% | 2009 | 3/3 | 1.0 | 2.3 | 57.7% | 63.9% | 43.1% | 66.6% | 29.9% | 55.2% | 32.5% |
| 22 | 2013 | 4/5 | 0.5 | 7.3 | 58.3% | 63.2% | 38.3% | 61.1% | 54.1% | 52.8% | 44.6% | 2010 | 3/3 | 0.7 | 3.3 | 66.8% | 46.4% | 27.4% | 30.6% | 65.2% | 40.1% | 37.1% |
| 23 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 10/10 | 2.6 | 2.0 | 55.2% | 62.7% | 47.0% | 55.4% | 37.8% | 55.6% | 40.6% |
| 24 | 2015 | 2/3 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 62.9% | 55.7% | 48.8% | 62.9% | 52.6% | 53.0% | 47.3% | 2012 | 29/31 | 1.8 | 3.3 | 51.9% | 63.3% | 45.1% | 43.9% | 43.4% | 54.2% | 40.8% |
| 25 | 2016 | 7/7 | 1.6 | 7.1 | 57.2% | 62.9% | 41.9% | 56.2% | 48.6% | 54.3% | 47.2% | 2013 | 30/32 | 0.8 | 3.4 | 57.3% | 59.2% | 41.6% | 48.3% | 47.8% | 52.1% | 40.5% |
| 26 | 2017 | 11/11 | 2.0 | 7.5 | 57.6% | 55.9% | 34.9% | 51.1% | 38.8% | 46.9% | 39.9% | 2014 | 35/39 | 1.6 | 2.5 | 59.0% | 61.7% | 47.9% | 47.6% | 42.2% | 56.5% | 39.0% |
| 27 | 2018 | 2/2 | 1.0 | 5.5 | 63.9% | 60.4% | 38.2% | 56.7% | 60.0% | 52.2% | 50.9% | 2015 | 17/17 | 1.2 | 2.4 | 64.6% | 55.0% | 45.9% | 46.8% | 32.9% | 51.7% | 34.8% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 11/11 | 1.2 | 3.4 | 67.1% | 59.9% | 46.4% | 55.7% | 42.7% | 55.3% | 43.8% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 8/8 | 1.1 | 2.6 | 64.9% | 58.5% | 39.6% | 51.7% | 42.9% | 51.9% | 39.0% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 4/4 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 70.9% | 40.3% | 43.1% | 33.2% | 43.8% | 41.3% | 40.0% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 65.3% | 66.0% | 36.0% | 57.1% | 25.0% | 55.6% | 24.6% |
| Career | — | 84/91 | 1.6 | 6.0 | 60.0% | 59.9% | 40.8% | 52.1% | 47.1% | 52.3% | 44.0% | — | 151/159 | 1.4 | 2.8 | 59.1% | 59.7% | 44.6% | 48.0% | 42.4% | 53.5% | 39.4% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Kai-Chen Chang | Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 2009 | 1558 | 119.4 | -1.06 | +1.66 | 1.024 | 50.6% | +11 | — | — | 50.0% | +0.08 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | 102.0 | +0.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 1565 | 115.7 | -2.81 | +0.01 | 0.923 | 48.1% | +27 | -48 | +36 | 41.1% | -0.68 | 3–7 (30%) | 1–0 | — | -0.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 1489 | 107.6 | -1.48 | -2.00 | 0.870 | 47.1% | +59 | — | — | 27.3% | -1.55 | 0–4 (0%) | 1–0 | — | +0.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 1579 | 117.3 | -2.25 | -0.69 | 0.939 | 48.7% | +62 | — | — | 44.2% | -0.47 | 2–3 (40%) | 4–2 (67%) | 100.8 | -0.04 | 2009 | 1474 | 97.6 | -0.70 | -3.36 | 0.724 | 44.6% | — | +23 | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.17 |
| 22 | 2013 | 1532 | 98.7 | -1.81 | -0.42 | 0.946 | 49.0% | +42 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.17 | 1–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.21 | 2010 | 1471 | 96.6 | -2.24 | -2.66 | 0.620 | 39.1% | — | +15 | — | 28.6% | -2.00 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.03 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1518 | 109.9 | -0.01 | -2.46 | 0.914 | 48.0% | +49 | -43 | — | 38.1% | -1.00 | 1–0 | 2–0 | — | -0.29 |
| 24 | 2015 | 1529 | 107.9 | -0.55 | -0.03 | 1.007 | 50.3% | +36 | — | — | 33.3% | -0.33 | — | — | — | -0.01 | 2012 | 1573 | 117.2 | -1.21 | -2.11 | 0.892 | 47.4% | +4 | -38 | +30 | 40.8% | -0.83 | 6–3 (67%) | 4–6 (40%) | 102.3 | -0.33 |
| 25 | 2016 | 1603 | 113.2 | -1.35 | +0.69 | 1.031 | 50.7% | +29 | — | — | 41.2% | +0.18 | 2–1 (67%) | — | — | +0.28 | 2013 | 1523 | 109.0 | -2.93 | -3.15 | 0.846 | 46.2% | -34 | +90 | +22 | 34.8% | -1.26 | 5–4 (56%) | 3–3 (50%) | 101.4 | +0.11 |
| 26 | 2017 | 1537 | 106.9 | -5.20 | -1.20 | 0.751 | 43.4% | +36 | — | — | 17.4% | -2.39 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | -0.21 | 2014 | 1565 | 116.5 | -0.09 | -3.75 | 0.897 | 48.1% | -110 | +123 | — | 43.2% | -0.42 | 6–6 (50%) | 5–6 (45%) | 101.5 | +0.01 |
| 27 | 2018 | 1536 | 102.0 | -0.12 | -0.26 | 1.065 | 51.5% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.27 | 2015 | 1490 | 104.4 | -3.29 | -3.97 | 0.720 | 44.0% | -71 | +85 | — | 21.9% | -1.97 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.55 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1488 | 100.9 | -1.09 | -0.42 | 0.981 | 49.4% | — | +107 | — | 46.2% | -0.42 | 2–2 (50%) | 0–2 | — | +0.75 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1492 | 103.8 | -0.97 | -3.58 | 0.810 | 45.2% | -129 | +87 | — | 22.2% | -1.61 | 0–2 | 2–4 (33%) | — | -0.02 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1541 | 108.6 | -2.90 | -0.39 | 0.680 | 40.5% | — | +59 | — | 11.1% | -3.11 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.40 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1545 | 99.9 | -3.32 | -2.04 | 0.553 | 41.9% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.02 |
| Career | — | 1646 | 117.6 | -2.39 | -0.31 | 0.921 | 48.2% | +38 | -48 | +36 | 37.7% | -0.76 | 11–18 (38%) | 9–8 (53%) | 98.4 | +0.74 | — | 1642 | 111.6 | -1.49 | -2.87 | 0.847 | 46.6% | -53 | +63 | +26 | 35.8% | -1.06 | 22–19 (54%) | 17–23 (43%) | 102.3 | -0.53 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Sílvia Soler-Espinosa
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roberta Vinci | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jul 11, 2014 | H2H |
| Misaki Doi | 3 | 2 | 5 | Apr 10, 2014 | H2H |
| Sloane Stephens | 1 | 3 | 4 | May 7, 2018 | H2H |
| Irina-Camelia Begu | 3 | 1 | 4 | Aug 27, 2014 | H2H |
| Carla Suárez Navarro | 0 | 4 | 4 | Mar 9, 2013 | H2H |