H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kai-Chen Chang vs Sybille Bammer H2H: 0-2
Sybille Bammer holds a 2–0 lead over Kai-Chen Chang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sybille Bammer leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sybille Bammer won the 2010 Kuala Lumpur quarterfinal 3-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 46
Left-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2010* | Kuala Lumpur | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Sybille Bammer | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | Kai-Chen Chang | Match data |
| Feb 12, 2010* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Sybille Bammer | 5-7 6-4 6-2 | Kai-Chen Chang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kai-Chen Chang | #1,233 | #82 | 808 | 1,647 | 32 | 59 | 35.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sybille Bammer | #161 | #19 | 2,014 | 1,844 | 130 | 139 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kai-Chen Chang | Sybille Bammer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #294 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #148 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #86 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #621 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #49 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #19 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #219 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #54 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #401 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 |