Kai-Chen Chang
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuai Zhang | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jul 27, 2017 | H2H |
| Shuai Peng | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 2, 2017 | H2H |
| Iveta Benesova | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 30, 2012 | H2H |
| Tamarine Tanasugarn | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 10, 2012 | H2H |
| Qiang Wang | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 12, 2017 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Tamarine Tanasugarn holds a 2–1 lead over Kai-Chen Chang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tamarine Tanasugarn leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tamarine Tanasugarn won the 2012 Pattaya round of 16 7-6(7) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamarine Tanasugarn | 7-6(7) 6-3 | Kai-Chen Chang | Match data | Feb 10, 2012* | R16 | Pattaya | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Tamarine Tanasugarn | 6-3 2-6 6-4 | Kai-Chen Chang | Match data | Oct 16, 2010* | QF | Japan Women's Open | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Kai-Chen Chang | 7-5 6-1 | Tamarine Tanasugarn | Match data | Oct 15, 2009* | R32 | Japan Women's Open | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kai-Chen Chang | #1,233 | #82 | 808 | 1,646 | 32 | 59 | 35.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tamarine Tanasugarn | #947 | #19 | 1,508 | 1,825 | 268 | 276 | 49.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kai-Chen Chang | Tamarine Tanasugarn | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #227 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #213 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #75 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #148 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #47 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #86 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #37 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #621 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #71 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #28 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #29 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #28 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #219 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #34 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #401 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #66 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #122 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #72 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #37 | 1,684 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #101 | 1,645 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #62 | 1,732 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #94 | 1,648 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #152 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #855 | 1,577 | 0 | 4 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Kai-Chen Chang | Tamarine Tanasugarn | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2009 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 12 | 11 | 23 | 52.2% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 21 | 2012 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 15 | 12 | 27 | 55.6% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 2013 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 19 | 12 | 31 | 61.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 24 | 2015 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 18 | 15 | 33 | 54.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2016 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 24 | 16 | 40 | 60.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 26 | 2017 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 21 | 16 | 37 | 56.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 27 | 2018 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 13 | 18 | 31 | 41.9% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 36.8% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 11 | 2 | 13 | 84.6% | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 12 | 5 | 17 | 70.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 30 | 45 | 75 | 40.0% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | — | — | — | — | — | 183 | 185 | 368 | 49.7% | 12 | 47 | 59 | 20.3% | 67 | 37 | 104 | 64.4% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 84/91 of Kai-Chen Chang's and 141/267 of Tamarine Tanasugarn's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Kai-Chen Chang | Tamarine Tanasugarn | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | 2009 | 9/10 | 1.0 | 4.1 | 64.7% | 59.0% | 43.6% | 58.2% | 54.3% | 53.4% | 47.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 22/24 | 1.6 | 6.8 | 58.9% | 58.6% | 41.8% | 54.0% | 46.2% | 51.7% | 44.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 9/9 | 1.7 | 4.6 | 63.3% | 61.6% | 39.8% | 49.4% | 42.5% | 53.4% | 40.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 18/20 | 1.8 | 5.3 | 59.7% | 62.2% | 41.6% | 43.4% | 47.6% | 54.1% | 43.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2013 | 4/5 | 0.5 | 7.3 | 58.3% | 63.2% | 38.3% | 61.1% | 54.1% | 52.8% | 44.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2015 | 2/3 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 62.9% | 55.7% | 48.8% | 62.9% | 52.6% | 53.0% | 47.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2016 | 7/7 | 1.6 | 7.1 | 57.2% | 62.9% | 41.9% | 56.2% | 48.6% | 54.3% | 47.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2017 | 11/11 | 2.0 | 7.5 | 57.6% | 55.9% | 34.9% | 51.1% | 38.8% | 46.9% | 39.9% | 2003 | 6/51 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 58.2% | 61.2% | 49.7% | 35.8% | 37.7% | 56.3% | 42.0% |
| 27 | 2018 | 2/2 | 1.0 | 5.5 | 63.9% | 60.4% | 38.2% | 56.7% | 60.0% | 52.2% | 50.9% | 2004 | 4/44 | 2.0 | 4.5 | 59.8% | 53.6% | 36.4% | 48.4% | 51.3% | 46.9% | 39.9% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 9/23 | 1.8 | 3.6 | 58.3% | 59.8% | 45.3% | 40.8% | 52.1% | 53.8% | 48.0% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 3/16 | 1.7 | 2.3 | 62.1% | 59.8% | 46.6% | 49.0% | 41.0% | 55.0% | 41.7% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 21/27 | 1.4 | 4.0 | 59.8% | 57.8% | 40.3% | 47.2% | 47.0% | 50.7% | 40.6% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 30/35 | 1.1 | 2.9 | 62.5% | 63.1% | 46.1% | 61.7% | 50.8% | 56.7% | 42.7% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 20/22 | 0.8 | 3.4 | 65.8% | 60.5% | 46.3% | 57.5% | 47.3% | 55.3% | 42.6% |
| 33 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 22/23 | 1.0 | 3.1 | 68.1% | 58.7% | 51.5% | 55.0% | 56.2% | 56.1% | 48.3% |
| 34 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 14/14 | 0.7 | 3.4 | 63.9% | 56.7% | 43.6% | 34.9% | 42.6% | 51.9% | 40.0% |
| 35 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 11/11 | 1.0 | 3.5 | 64.1% | 52.1% | 45.1% | 43.9% | 58.9% | 49.2% | 41.3% |
| 38 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 67.2% | 51.3% | 36.8% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 46.6% | 30.9% |
| Career | — | 84/91 | 1.6 | 6.0 | 60.0% | 59.9% | 40.8% | 52.1% | 47.1% | 52.3% | 44.0% | — | 141/544 | 1.1 | 3.3 | 63.2% | 59.0% | 45.5% | 50.7% | 49.7% | 53.9% | 43.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Kai-Chen Chang | Tamarine Tanasugarn | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1483 | 96.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -1.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.17 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1493 | 103.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.83 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.06 |
| 18 | 2009 | 1558 | 119.4 | -1.06 | +1.66 | 1.024 | 50.6% | +11 | — | — | 50.0% | +0.08 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | 102.0 | +0.20 | 1995 | 1479 | 101.3 | — | — | — | — | +23 | — | — | 29.4% | -1.53 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–2 (33%) | 100.8 | +0.28 |
| 19 | 2010 | 1565 | 115.7 | -2.81 | +0.01 | 0.923 | 48.1% | +27 | -48 | +36 | 41.1% | -0.68 | 3–7 (30%) | 1–0 | — | -0.25 | 1996 | 1610 | 124.2 | — | — | — | — | +2 | — | — | 64.3% | +1.21 | 0–2 | 1–3 (25%) | — | +0.66 |
| 20 | 2011 | 1489 | 107.6 | -1.48 | -2.00 | 0.870 | 47.1% | +59 | — | — | 27.3% | -1.55 | 0–4 (0%) | 1–0 | — | +0.22 | 1997 | 1648 | 125.4 | — | — | — | — | -4 | -102 | +9 | 48.3% | -0.34 | 5–6 (45%) | 3–2 (60%) | 100.9 | +1.65 |
| 21 | 2012 | 1579 | 117.3 | -2.25 | -0.69 | 0.939 | 48.7% | +62 | — | — | 44.2% | -0.47 | 2–3 (40%) | 4–2 (67%) | 100.8 | -0.04 | 1998 | 1702 | 138.7 | — | — | — | — | +13 | -199 | +25 | 48.9% | -0.10 | 5–5 (50%) | 3–4 (43%) | 99.1 | +1.91 |
| 22 | 2013 | 1532 | 98.7 | -1.81 | -0.42 | 0.946 | 49.0% | +42 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.17 | 1–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.21 | 1999 | 1634 | 113.0 | — | — | — | — | -11 | -165 | +110 | 40.8% | -0.57 | 3–4 (43%) | 3–2 (60%) | 99.4 | +0.52 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1792 | 139.5 | — | — | — | — | -52 | -296 | +110 | 59.5% | +0.54 | 7–4 (64%) | 6–7 (46%) | 102.9 | -1.30 |
| 24 | 2015 | 1529 | 107.9 | -0.55 | -0.03 | 1.007 | 50.3% | +36 | — | — | 33.3% | -0.33 | — | — | — | -0.01 | 2001 | 1698 | 135.6 | — | — | — | — | +14 | -272 | +291 | 51.5% | +0.09 | 8–9 (47%) | 7–6 (54%) | 97.5 | +2.28 |
| 25 | 2016 | 1603 | 113.2 | -1.35 | +0.69 | 1.031 | 50.7% | +29 | — | — | 41.2% | +0.18 | 2–1 (67%) | — | — | +0.28 | 2002 | 1677 | 130.8 | — | — | — | — | +37 | -232 | +254 | 52.5% | +0.01 | 15–10 (60%) | 7–6 (54%) | 101.9 | +2.48 |
| 26 | 2017 | 1537 | 106.9 | -5.20 | -1.20 | 0.751 | 43.4% | +36 | — | — | 17.4% | -2.39 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | -0.21 | 2003 | 1695 | 137.1 | +0.58 | -0.37 | 0.961 | 48.9% | +45 | -272 | +201 | 54.7% | +0.32 | 7–8 (47%) | 5–6 (45%) | 97.4 | +0.78 |
| 27 | 2018 | 1536 | 102.0 | -0.12 | -0.26 | 1.065 | 51.5% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.27 | 2004 | 1610 | 121.0 | -2.76 | -1.27 | 0.751 | 43.8% | -13 | -221 | +320 | 45.7% | -0.05 | 2–8 (20%) | 3–4 (43%) | 92.4 | +1.55 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1497 | 98.5 | -0.83 | +0.77 | 1.037 | 50.9% | -9 | -166 | +399 | 30.6% | -1.35 | 2–1 (67%) | 0–2 | — | +0.91 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1585 | 113.8 | -0.78 | -1.37 | 0.927 | 47.9% | -34 | — | +318 | 52.8% | +0.56 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–3 (25%) | 98.4 | +0.99 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1569 | 117.4 | -2.84 | -1.65 | 0.822 | 45.7% | 0 | -212 | — | 29.8% | -1.54 | 4–3 (57%) | 2–1 (67%) | 103.0 | -2.05 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1684 | 130.6 | +1.07 | -0.63 | 0.987 | 49.9% | -102 | — | +348 | 53.2% | -0.05 | 5–4 (56%) | 5–1 (83%) | 104.5 | -1.05 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1646 | 112.2 | -0.30 | -0.53 | 0.953 | 49.0% | -110 | -287 | +344 | 46.9% | -0.18 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–1 (67%) | 99.3 | -0.13 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1732 | 129.8 | +0.24 | +3.07 | 1.101 | 52.2% | -26 | — | +172 | 55.8% | +0.65 | 5–1 (83%) | 2–2 (50%) | 104.9 | -0.51 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1648 | 112.1 | -1.46 | -2.12 | 0.832 | 45.7% | -16 | — | — | 28.6% | -1.57 | — | — | — | -0.69 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1595 | 100.2 | -3.00 | -1.41 | 0.812 | 45.8% | +29 | — | — | 31.8% | -1.59 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.01 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1577 | 97.4 | -0.66 | -2.32 | 0.578 | 38.9% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.05 |
| Career | — | 1646 | 117.6 | -2.39 | -0.31 | 0.921 | 48.2% | +38 | -48 | +36 | 37.7% | -0.76 | 11–18 (38%) | 9–8 (53%) | 98.4 | +0.74 | — | 1825 | 132.1 | -0.71 | -0.34 | 0.932 | 48.5% | -6 | -214 | +226 | 48.6% | -0.13 | 77–74 (51%) | 52–55 (49%) | 98.6 | +1.57 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuai Zhang | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jul 27, 2017 | H2H |
| Shuai Peng | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 2, 2017 | H2H |
| Iveta Benesova | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 30, 2012 | H2H |
| Tamarine Tanasugarn | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 10, 2012 | H2H |
| Qiang Wang | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 12, 2017 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Venus Williams | 0 | 7 | 7 | Jul 3, 2008 | H2H |
| Amélie Mauresmo | 2 | 4 | 6 | Feb 21, 2008 | H2H |
| Nicole Pratt | 3 | 3 | 6 | Mar 24, 2005 | H2H |
| Jill Craybas | 4 | 2 | 6 | Oct 8, 2004 | H2H |
| Magdalena Maleeva | 4 | 2 | 6 | Jun 11, 2004 | H2H |