H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Kai-Chen Chang vs Tamarine Tanasugarn H2H: 1-2

Tamarine Tanasugarn holds a 2–1 lead over Kai-Chen Chang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tamarine Tanasugarn leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tamarine Tanasugarn won the 2012 Pattaya Open round of 16 7-6(7) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kai-Chen Chang
Chinese Taipei Age 35 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tamarine Tanasugarn #94 7-6(7) 6-3 Kai-Chen Chang #110 Match data Feb 10, 2012* R16 Pattaya Open WTA 250 Hard
Tamarine Tanasugarn #94 6-3 2-6 6-4 Kai-Chen Chang #116 Match data Oct 16, 2010* QF Japan Women's Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Kai-Chen Chang #107 7-5 6-1 Tamarine Tanasugarn #113 Match data Oct 15, 2009* R32 Japan Women's Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kai-Chen Chang — #82 808 1,646 32 59 35.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tamarine Tanasugarn — #19 1,508 1,825 268 276 49.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kai-Chen Chang Tamarine Tanasugarn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,483 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,493 0 0
18 2009 5–5 50.0% #94 1,558 0 0 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,479 0 0
19 2010 9–15 37.5% #117 1,565 0 0 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,610 0 0
20 2011 1–8 11.1% #148 1,489 0 0 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,648 0 0
21 2012 9–11 45.0% #86 1,579 0 0 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0
22 2013 1–4 20.0% #621 1,532 0 0 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,633 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2000 31–19 62.0% #28 1,792 0 0
24 2015 1–2 33.3% #134 1,529 0 0 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,698 0 0
25 2016 3–4 42.9% #131 1,602 0 0 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0
26 2017 2–9 18.2% #219 1,536 0 0 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1
27 2018 1–1 50.0% #401 1,536 0 0 2004 19–25 43.2% #66 1,609 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,496 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,584 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,568 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2008 19–16 54.3% #37 1,684 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,646 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,732 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,648 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,595 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kai-Chen Chang Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 7 9 16 43.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1996 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2011 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1997 12 11 23 52.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2012 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1998 15 12 27 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2013 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 19 12 31 61.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2015 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 18 15 33 54.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
25 2016 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 24 16 40 60.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2017 2 7 9 22.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2003 21 16 37 56.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 2018 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 13 18 31 41.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 3 10 13 23.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 7 12 19 36.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 12 5 17 70.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 30 45 75 40.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — — 183 185 368 49.7% 12 47 59 20.3% 67 37 104 64.4% 6 7 13 46.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 84/91 of Kai-Chen Chang's and 141/267 of Tamarine Tanasugarn's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Kai-Chen Chang Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2009 9/10 1.0 4.1 64.7% 59.0% 43.6% 58.2% 54.3% 53.4% 47.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 22/24 1.6 6.8 58.9% 58.6% 41.8% 54.0% 46.2% 51.7% 44.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 9/9 1.7 4.6 63.3% 61.6% 39.8% 49.4% 42.5% 53.4% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 18/20 1.8 5.3 59.7% 62.2% 41.6% 43.4% 47.6% 54.1% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2013 4/5 0.5 7.3 58.3% 63.2% 38.3% 61.1% 54.1% 52.8% 44.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2015 2/3 2.0 3.0 62.9% 55.7% 48.8% 62.9% 52.6% 53.0% 47.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2016 7/7 1.6 7.1 57.2% 62.9% 41.9% 56.2% 48.6% 54.3% 47.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2017 11/11 2.0 7.5 57.6% 55.9% 34.9% 51.1% 38.8% 46.9% 39.9% 2003 6/51 2.0 3.0 58.2% 61.2% 49.7% 35.8% 37.7% 56.3% 42.0%
27 2018 2/2 1.0 5.5 63.9% 60.4% 38.2% 56.7% 60.0% 52.2% 50.9% 2004 4/44 2.0 4.5 59.8% 53.6% 36.4% 48.4% 51.3% 46.9% 39.9%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 9/23 1.8 3.6 58.3% 59.8% 45.3% 40.8% 52.1% 53.8% 48.0%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 3/16 1.7 2.3 62.1% 59.8% 46.6% 49.0% 41.0% 55.0% 41.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 21/27 1.4 4.0 59.8% 57.8% 40.3% 47.2% 47.0% 50.7% 40.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 30/35 1.1 2.9 62.5% 63.1% 46.1% 61.7% 50.8% 56.7% 42.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 20/22 0.8 3.4 65.8% 60.5% 46.3% 57.5% 47.3% 55.3% 42.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 22/23 1.0 3.1 68.1% 58.7% 51.5% 55.0% 56.2% 56.1% 48.3%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 14/14 0.7 3.4 63.9% 56.7% 43.6% 34.9% 42.6% 51.9% 40.0%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 11/11 1.0 3.5 64.1% 52.1% 45.1% 43.9% 58.9% 49.2% 41.3%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 1/1 0.0 4.0 67.2% 51.3% 36.8% 50.0% 50.0% 46.6% 30.9%
Career — 84/91 1.6 6.0 60.0% 59.9% 40.8% 52.1% 47.1% 52.3% 44.0% — 141/544 1.1 3.3 63.2% 59.0% 45.5% 50.8% 49.7% 53.9% 43.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kai-Chen Chang Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1483 96.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.17
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1493 103.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.83 1–1 — — +0.06
18 2009 1558 119.5 -1.06 +1.66 1.024 50.6% +10 — — 50.0% +0.08 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 102.0 +0.20 1995 1479 101.4 — — — — +23 — — 29.4% -1.53 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.8 +0.28
19 2010 1565 115.7 -2.81 +0.01 0.923 48.1% +27 -47 +37 41.1% -0.68 3–7 (30%) 1–0 — -0.25 1996 1610 124.2 — — — — +2 — — 64.3% +1.21 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.66
20 2011 1489 107.6 -1.48 -2.00 0.870 47.1% +59 — — 27.3% -1.55 0–4 (0%) 1–0 — +0.22 1997 1648 125.5 — — — — -4 -102 +9 48.3% -0.34 5–6 (45%) 3–2 (60%) 100.9 +1.65
21 2012 1579 117.4 -2.25 -0.69 0.939 48.7% +63 — — 44.2% -0.47 2–3 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.8 -0.04 1998 1702 138.7 — — — — +13 -199 +20 48.9% -0.10 5–5 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.1 +1.91
22 2013 1532 98.7 -1.81 -0.42 0.946 49.0% +42 — — 25.0% -1.17 1–1 0–2 — +0.21 1999 1634 113.0 — — — — -11 -164 +111 40.8% -0.57 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 99.4 +0.52
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1792 139.5 — — — — -52 -296 +110 59.5% +0.54 7–4 (64%) 6–7 (46%) 102.9 -1.29
24 2015 1530 107.9 -0.55 -0.03 1.007 50.3% +35 — — 33.3% -0.33 — — — -0.01 2001 1698 135.6 — — — — +14 -272 +291 51.5% +0.09 8–9 (47%) 7–6 (54%) 97.5 +2.28
25 2016 1603 113.2 -1.35 +0.69 1.031 50.7% +29 — — 41.2% +0.18 2–1 (67%) — — +0.28 2002 1677 130.8 — — — — +37 -232 +254 52.5% +0.01 15–10 (60%) 7–6 (54%) 101.9 +2.48
26 2017 1537 106.9 -5.20 -1.20 0.751 43.4% +37 — — 17.4% -2.39 1–0 1–1 — -0.21 2003 1695 137.1 +0.58 -0.37 0.961 48.9% +45 -272 +201 54.7% +0.32 7–8 (47%) 5–6 (45%) 97.4 +0.78
27 2018 1536 102.0 -0.12 -0.26 1.065 51.5% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 0–1 — +0.27 2004 1610 121.0 -2.76 -1.27 0.751 43.8% -13 -221 +320 45.7% -0.05 2–8 (20%) 3–4 (43%) 92.4 +1.55
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1497 98.5 -0.83 +0.77 1.037 50.9% -9 -166 +399 30.6% -1.35 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — +0.91
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1585 113.8 -0.78 -1.37 0.927 47.9% -33 — +318 52.8% +0.56 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.4 +0.99
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1569 117.5 -2.84 -1.65 0.822 45.7% -1 -211 — 29.8% -1.54 4–3 (57%) 2–1 (67%) 103.0 -1.96
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1685 130.6 +1.07 -0.63 0.987 49.9% -104 — +348 53.2% -0.05 5–4 (56%) 5–1 (83%) 104.5 -1.04
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1646 112.2 -0.30 -0.53 0.953 49.0% -110 -287 +344 46.9% -0.18 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.3 -0.12
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1733 129.8 +0.24 +3.07 1.101 52.2% -27 — +171 55.8% +0.65 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) 104.9 -0.50
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1649 112.2 -1.46 -2.12 0.832 45.7% -17 — — 28.6% -1.57 — — — -0.69
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1595 100.2 -3.00 -1.41 0.812 45.8% +29 — — 31.8% -1.59 1–1 1–1 — -0.01
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1578 97.4 -0.66 -2.32 0.578 38.9% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — +0.05
Career — 1646 117.6 -2.39 -0.31 0.921 48.2% +38 -47 +37 37.7% -0.76 11–18 (38%) 9–8 (53%) 98.4 +0.74 — 1825 132.1 -0.71 -0.34 0.932 48.5% -6 -214 +226 48.6% -0.13 77–74 (51%) 52–55 (49%) 98.6 +1.60

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.