H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kai-Chen Chang vs Vera Dushevina H2H: 0-1
Vera Dushevina holds a 1–0 lead over Kai-Chen Chang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vera Dushevina leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Vera Dushevina won the 2010 Charleston third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2010* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Vera Dushevina | 6-2 6-2 | Kai-Chen Chang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kai-Chen Chang | #1,233 | #82 | 808 | 1,647 | 32 | 59 | 35.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Vera Dushevina | #741 | #31 | 1,490 | 1,786 | 143 | 172 | 45.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kai-Chen Chang | Vera Dushevina | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #473 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #113 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #148 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #63 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #86 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #621 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #97 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #40 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #89 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #219 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #401 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #86 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #463 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |