H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Kai-Chen Chang vs Yanina Wickmayer H2H: 0-1

Yanina Wickmayer holds a 1–0 lead over Kai-Chen Chang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yanina Wickmayer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yanina Wickmayer won the 2012 Stanford round of 32 7-5 2-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kai-Chen Chang
Chinese Taipei Age 35 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Yanina Wickmayer
Belgium Age 36 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Yanina Wickmayer #37 7-5 2-6 7-5 Kai-Chen Chang #118 Match data Jul 12, 2012* R32 Stanford Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kai-Chen Chang #1,233 #82 808 1,646 32 59 35.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Yanina Wickmayer #765 #12 3,320 1,933 223 217 50.7% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kai-Chen Chang Yanina Wickmayer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2009 5–5 50.0% #94 1,558 0 0 2008 10–14 41.7% #73 1,540 0 0
19 2010 9–15 37.5% #117 1,565 0 0 2009 32–16 66.7% #16 1,844 0 2
20 2011 1–8 11.1% #148 1,488 0 0 2010 31–21 59.6% #23 1,770 0 3
21 2012 9–11 45.0% #86 1,579 0 0 2011 28–18 60.9% #26 1,772 0 3
22 2013 1–4 20.0% #621 1,531 0 0 2012 29–26 52.7% #23 1,618 0 3
23 — — — — — — — 2013 17–24 41.5% #51 1,589 0 3
24 2015 1–2 33.3% #134 1,529 0 0 2014 13–19 40.6% #75 1,556 0 3
25 2016 3–4 42.9% #131 1,602 0 0 2015 18–17 51.4% #41 1,684 0 4
26 2017 2–9 18.2% #219 1,536 0 0 2016 19–24 44.2% #58 1,635 0 5
27 2018 1–1 50.0% #401 1,536 0 0 2017 11–14 44.0% #115 1,638 0 5
28 — — — — — — — 2018 3–5 37.5% #122 1,644 0 5
29 — — — — — — — 2019 2–2 50.0% #152 1,582 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 2020 0–1 0.0% #166 1,578 0 5
32 — — — — — — — 2022 2–3 40.0% #321 1,561 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2023 8–7 53.3% #71 1,655 0 5
34 — — — — — — — 2024 0–3 0.0% #765 1,532 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2025 0–3 0.0% — 1,501 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kai-Chen Chang Yanina Wickmayer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2009 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 5 10 15 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
19 2010 7 9 16 43.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2009 19 11 30 63.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
20 2011 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2010 22 14 36 61.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2012 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2011 13 10 23 56.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 2013 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 16 15 31 51.6% 7 7 14 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 10 14 24 41.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2015 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 9 14 23 39.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
25 2016 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 13 12 25 52.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 2017 2 7 9 22.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2016 15 15 30 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
27 2018 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 8 9 17 47.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
Career — 30 45 75 40.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — — 141 139 280 50.4% 36 40 76 47.4% 40 34 74 54.1% 6 4 10 60.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 84/91 of Kai-Chen Chang's and 396/440 of Yanina Wickmayer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Kai-Chen Chang Yanina Wickmayer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2009 9/10 1.0 4.1 64.7% 59.0% 43.6% 58.2% 54.3% 53.4% 47.7% 2008 20/24 3.6 4.6 59.0% 66.6% 45.8% 56.1% 42.9% 58.2% 40.4%
19 2010 22/24 1.6 6.8 58.9% 58.6% 41.8% 54.0% 46.2% 51.7% 44.6% 2009 47/48 2.3 4.2 64.9% 65.0% 47.0% 48.0% 51.3% 58.7% 46.6%
20 2011 9/9 1.7 4.6 63.3% 61.6% 39.8% 49.4% 42.5% 53.4% 40.5% 2010 49/52 3.2 4.0 65.2% 65.8% 50.0% 55.9% 47.0% 60.1% 44.2%
21 2012 18/20 1.8 5.3 59.7% 62.2% 41.6% 43.4% 47.6% 54.1% 43.1% 2011 43/46 2.8 3.4 66.4% 62.9% 45.7% 48.4% 49.9% 56.9% 42.5%
22 2013 4/5 0.5 7.3 58.3% 63.2% 38.3% 61.1% 54.1% 52.8% 44.6% 2012 48/55 1.6 3.8 64.8% 60.4% 47.6% 48.1% 50.4% 55.7% 45.3%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 36/41 1.6 4.7 62.4% 62.1% 41.6% 53.8% 48.3% 54.4% 40.2%
24 2015 2/3 2.0 3.0 62.9% 55.7% 48.8% 62.9% 52.6% 53.0% 47.3% 2014 31/32 1.6 4.5 60.8% 59.2% 43.5% 46.3% 43.7% 52.5% 39.2%
25 2016 7/7 1.6 7.1 57.2% 62.9% 41.9% 56.2% 48.6% 54.3% 47.2% 2015 23/35 2.8 4.7 64.6% 63.4% 46.1% 56.5% 41.3% 57.4% 38.2%
26 2017 11/11 2.0 7.5 57.6% 55.9% 34.9% 51.1% 38.8% 46.9% 39.9% 2016 35/43 3.9 3.6 62.9% 65.8% 43.4% 43.8% 49.2% 57.4% 40.9%
27 2018 2/2 1.0 5.5 63.9% 60.4% 38.2% 56.7% 60.0% 52.2% 50.9% 2017 25/25 3.3 3.4 62.7% 65.5% 43.0% 59.3% 40.7% 57.0% 38.8%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 8/8 1.9 2.3 67.2% 62.1% 44.1% 48.5% 38.3% 56.1% 40.4%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 4/4 5.8 3.5 61.1% 61.6% 50.3% 60.8% 38.1% 57.0% 40.3%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 1/1 5.0 3.0 46.9% 69.6% 42.3% 0.0% 0.0% 55.1% 32.2%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 5/5 1.6 2.6 66.4% 66.2% 34.6% 58.7% 37.6% 55.6% 45.4%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 15/15 2.6 4.3 64.2% 61.8% 39.4% 55.5% 53.6% 53.7% 44.3%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 3/3 1.0 4.3 70.9% 61.3% 39.0% 42.9% 30.9% 55.1% 41.1%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 3/3 1.0 4.0 65.6% 45.4% 29.2% 30.6% 29.4% 40.1% 36.6%
Career — 84/91 1.6 6.0 60.0% 59.9% 40.8% 52.1% 47.1% 52.3% 44.0% — 396/440 2.6 4.0 63.9% 63.3% 45.2% 50.9% 46.9% 56.6% 42.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kai-Chen Chang Yanina Wickmayer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2009 1558 119.4 -1.06 +1.66 1.024 50.6% +11 — — 50.0% +0.08 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 102.0 +0.20 2008 1541 118.5 +1.10 -2.21 0.965 49.3% -12 — +153 45.6% -0.37 3–6 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 96.9 -0.19
19 2010 1565 115.7 -2.81 +0.01 0.923 48.1% +27 -48 +36 41.1% -0.68 3–7 (30%) 1–0 — -0.25 2009 1845 138.9 +2.89 +2.24 1.129 52.5% -67 -217 -63 63.4% +0.73 9–9 (50%) 9–5 (64%) 108.5 -0.38
20 2011 1489 107.6 -1.48 -2.00 0.870 47.1% +59 — — 27.3% -1.55 0–4 (0%) 1–0 — +0.22 2010 1771 147.6 +3.55 +1.24 1.108 52.1% -25 -73 +42 58.2% +0.54 9–9 (50%) 10–6 (63%) 99.6 -0.09
21 2012 1579 117.3 -2.25 -0.69 0.939 48.7% +62 — — 44.2% -0.47 2–3 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.8 -0.04 2011 1772 137.9 +1.53 -0.96 0.987 49.9% -34 -18 +65 58.7% +0.55 13–5 (72%) 6–5 (55%) 109.7 -0.40
22 2013 1532 98.7 -1.81 -0.42 0.946 49.0% +42 — — 25.0% -1.17 1–1 0–2 — +0.21 2012 1618 128.3 +0.06 +1.37 1.022 50.5% +42 +98 +183 54.1% +0.12 6–10 (38%) 7–7 (50%) 93.9 +3.14
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1590 122.3 -1.06 -2.39 0.882 47.6% +21 +17 +202 44.3% -0.46 8–9 (47%) 5–5 (50%) 96.9 -0.49
24 2015 1529 107.9 -0.55 -0.03 1.007 50.3% +36 — — 33.3% -0.33 — — — -0.01 2014 1556 109.0 -2.75 -3.18 0.825 46.0% -10 +67 +179 42.4% -1.06 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 101.0 +0.61
25 2016 1603 113.2 -1.35 +0.69 1.031 50.7% +29 — — 41.2% +0.18 2–1 (67%) — — +0.28 2015 1684 131.2 +0.06 -2.08 0.896 48.0% -6 -86 +30 50.6% +0.10 8–5 (62%) 0–4 (0%) 100.6 -1.93
26 2017 1537 106.9 -5.20 -1.20 0.751 43.4% +36 — — 17.4% -2.39 1–0 1–1 — -0.21 2016 1635 130.0 +1.11 -1.54 0.959 49.0% +11 -60 +35 46.6% -0.07 7–10 (41%) 3–10 (23%) 90.8 -1.27
27 2018 1536 102.0 -0.12 -0.26 1.065 51.5% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 0–1 — +0.27 2017 1638 118.0 +0.72 -2.73 0.903 48.1% +22 -82 +35 43.6% -0.56 3–2 (60%) 4–4 (50%) 101.3 -0.90
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1644 116.3 -0.80 -1.10 0.921 48.4% +42 — +44 37.5% -0.75 — 0–2 — +0.44
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1582 105.8 0.00 +0.01 0.938 48.6% — — — 50.0% -0.70 1–1 1–0 — +0.07
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1578 101.7 -0.40 +1.21 0.717 42.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.23
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1561 112.3 -0.11 +0.15 1.022 50.5% +6 — — 45.5% +0.09 0–1 — — -0.10
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1655 132.7 -1.00 +0.89 0.957 49.0% 0 — — 56.7% +0.27 1–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.31
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1533 98.0 -1.89 -3.41 0.914 47.1% -5 — — 25.0% -1.38 0–2 1–1 — +0.10
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1502 92.0 -2.96 -3.50 0.612 38.4% — — — 14.3% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.17
Career — 1646 117.6 -2.39 -0.31 0.921 48.2% +38 -48 +36 37.7% -0.76 11–18 (38%) 9–8 (53%) 98.4 +0.74 — 1934 133.4 +0.75 -0.56 0.975 49.5% -5 -28 +78 51.3% 0.00 72–75 (49%) 54–60 (47%) 98.9 -0.40

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.