H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Kai-Chen Chang vs Yanina Wickmayer H2H: 0-1
Yanina Wickmayer holds a 1–0 lead over Kai-Chen Chang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yanina Wickmayer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yanina Wickmayer won the 2012 Stanford third round 7-5 2-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 36
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2012* | Stanford | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Yanina Wickmayer | 7-5 2-6 7-5 | Kai-Chen Chang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kai-Chen Chang | #1,233 | #82 | 808 | 1,647 | 32 | 59 | 35.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Yanina Wickmayer | #765 | #12 | 3,320 | 1,932 | 218 | 217 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kai-Chen Chang | Yanina Wickmayer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #73 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 |
| 2011 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #148 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #23 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 |
| 2012 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #86 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 3 |
| 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #621 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #23 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #51 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 |
| 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #75 | 1,556 | 0 | 3 |
| 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #219 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #41 | 1,684 | 0 | 4 |
| 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #401 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #58 | 1,574 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #115 | 1,624 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #122 | 1,637 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #152 | 1,560 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,565 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #321 | 1,554 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #71 | 1,651 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,530 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,500 | 0 | 5 |