Kai-Lin Zhang
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rebecca Peterson | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 21, 2017 | H2H |
| Jana Fett | 1 | 0 | 1 | Sep 20, 2017 | H2H |
| Nao Hibino | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 27, 2017 | H2H |
| Ashleigh Barty | 0 | 1 | 1 | Mar 4, 2017 | H2H |
| Risa Ozaki | 1 | 0 | 1 | Mar 3, 2017 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Kai-Lin Zhang vs Jie Zheng H2H: 0-1
Jie Zheng holds a 1–0 lead over Kai-Lin Zhang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jie Zheng leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jie Zheng won the 2014 Hong Kong Open round of 16 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jie Zheng | 6-1 6-4 | Kai-Lin Zhang | Match data | Sep 12, 2014* | R16 | Hong Kong Open | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kai-Lin Zhang | #1,265 | #103 | 611 | 1,560 | 9 | 15 | 37.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jie Zheng | #961 | #15 | 2,745 | 1,906 | 218 | 196 | 52.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kai-Lin Zhang | Jie Zheng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #191 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #84 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #79 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #216 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #44 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #33 | 1,777 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #35 | 1,782 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #48 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #26 | 1,652 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,687 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #91 | 1,670 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #962 | 1,648 | 0 | 4 |
Surface Results by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Kai-Lin Zhang | Jie Zheng | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 2014 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 2016 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 2017 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 17 | 11 | 28 | 60.7% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 15 | 9 | 24 | 62.5% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 19 | 13 | 32 | 59.4% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 16 | 12 | 28 | 57.1% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 15 | 14 | 29 | 51.7% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 17 | 15 | 32 | 53.1% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 12 | 12 | 24 | 50.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 9 | 14 | 23 | 39.1% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | Career | 143 | 126 | 269 | 53.2% | 48 | 44 | 92 | 52.2% | 24 | 22 | 46 | 52.2% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
Performance Progression by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 21/21 of Kai-Lin Zhang's and 286/397 of Jie Zheng's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Kai-Lin Zhang | Jie Zheng | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% |
| 2014 | 7/7 | 0.3 | 5.9 | 51.0% | 58.7% | 44.7% | 47.2% | 47.2% | 52.1% | 48.3% | 2004 | 5/28 | 0.2 | 3.2 | 67.1% | 53.1% | 34.7% | 39.7% | 34.3% | 47.4% | 39.7% |
| 2016 | 6/6 | 0.3 | 5.7 | 58.0% | 52.6% | 35.4% | 31.6% | 50.9% | 46.0% | 43.2% | 2005 | 3/39 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 73.6% | 54.5% | 45.8% | 58.2% | 43.9% | 52.9% | 38.8% |
| 2017 | 8/8 | 0.8 | 3.8 | 55.7% | 54.4% | 46.4% | 46.2% | 42.9% | 51.1% | 42.4% | 2006 | 24/41 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 72.3% | 57.7% | 47.0% | 48.1% | 46.4% | 54.3% | 46.5% |
| — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 16/17 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 71.3% | 62.6% | 45.3% | 56.9% | 44.4% | 57.9% | 45.5% |
| — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 24/33 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 64.9% | 62.6% | 48.5% | 56.7% | 50.6% | 57.3% | 47.3% |
| — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 44/48 | 0.6 | 2.2 | 70.2% | 61.5% | 47.3% | 51.4% | 52.7% | 57.3% | 45.8% |
| — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 39/41 | 0.5 | 2.8 | 69.7% | 57.6% | 43.9% | 55.1% | 47.7% | 53.4% | 45.3% |
| — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 36/41 | 0.3 | 2.5 | 73.5% | 57.0% | 40.0% | 48.0% | 48.8% | 52.5% | 42.9% |
| — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 38/49 | 0.5 | 2.4 | 68.6% | 60.5% | 46.7% | 49.0% | 51.9% | 56.3% | 44.8% |
| — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 33/34 | 0.4 | 2.7 | 70.4% | 56.4% | 44.3% | 47.0% | 46.9% | 52.9% | 44.4% |
| — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 23/25 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 70.5% | 57.6% | 42.9% | 53.2% | 57.7% | 53.1% | 44.0% |
| — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 64.7% | 48.5% | 27.8% | 61.5% | 14.3% | 41.2% | 37.9% |
| Career | 21/24 | 0.5 | 5.0 | 54.8% | 55.3% | 42.7% | 42.3% | 46.6% | 50.0% | 44.6% | Career | 286/414 | 0.5 | 2.3 | 70.1% | 58.9% | 44.8% | 51.2% | 49.4% | 54.7% | 44.9% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Kai-Lin Zhang | Jie Zheng | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 2014 | 1524 | 113.6 | -1.64 | +1.32 | 1.007 | 50.0% | +9 | — | — | 46.7% | -0.07 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.12 | 2002 | 1507 | 104.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.60 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | +0.03 |
| 2015 | 1519 | 104.8 | — | — | — | — | +7 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.63 | 0–2 | 1–0 | — | -0.05 | 2003 | 1536 | 113.8 | — | — | — | — | +24 | — | — | 51.6% | +0.06 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | +0.41 |
| 2016 | 1475 | 96.0 | -3.89 | -1.11 | 0.800 | 44.7% | +4 | — | — | 35.7% | -1.21 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.26 | 2004 | 1547 | 127.3 | -2.88 | -1.53 | 0.755 | 43.6% | +22 | +39 | -34 | 39.7% | -0.48 | 2–5 (29%) | 2–0 | — | +0.21 |
| 2017 | 1519 | 111.7 | -2.40 | -0.65 | 0.869 | 46.8% | +6 | — | — | 42.1% | -0.89 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | +0.45 | 2005 | 1702 | 131.1 | -0.46 | -1.44 | 0.823 | 45.8% | -19 | -40 | — | 55.4% | +0.42 | 11–5 (69%) | 4–3 (57%) | 107.3 | -0.22 |
| 2018 | 1511 | 95.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1778 | 132.0 | -1.03 | +1.40 | 1.019 | 50.5% | -50 | -22 | -207 | 58.9% | +0.37 | 7–8 (47%) | 8–3 (73%) | 103.8 | -0.42 |
| 2019 | 1505 | 97.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1690 | 124.7 | +1.30 | +1.45 | 1.082 | 51.4% | -13 | +33 | — | 45.9% | -0.08 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–3 (0%) | 91.7 | -0.24 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1845 | 147.4 | +1.86 | +3.35 | 1.109 | 52.4% | -68 | -101 | -119 | 59.7% | +1.01 | 7–1 (88%) | 2–3 (40%) | 107.4 | -2.42 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1782 | 142.7 | +1.41 | +2.49 | 1.073 | 51.6% | +25 | -47 | -70 | 54.5% | +0.39 | 10–6 (63%) | 6–6 (50%) | 104.2 | -0.17 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1763 | 139.6 | -1.89 | +1.53 | 0.971 | 49.4% | +49 | -45 | -75 | 52.6% | -0.01 | 9–6 (60%) | 7–0 (100%) | 106.1 | +0.54 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1705 | 120.3 | -2.95 | -0.51 | 0.903 | 47.7% | +56 | -98 | -88 | 43.9% | -0.58 | 9–9 (50%) | 3–5 (38%) | 95.0 | +0.59 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1653 | 131.5 | +0.57 | +1.44 | 1.024 | 50.6% | +36 | -75 | +52 | 49.5% | -0.10 | 6–7 (46%) | 3–3 (50%) | 100.4 | -0.25 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1688 | 126.6 | -2.38 | +0.84 | 0.941 | 48.5% | -1 | -50 | — | 47.5% | -0.36 | 8–4 (67%) | 5–3 (63%) | 107.5 | +0.29 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1670 | 119.0 | -1.86 | +0.63 | 0.939 | 48.7% | -33 | -52 | +57 | 46.2% | -0.42 | 2–2 (50%) | 5–1 (83%) | 101.8 | -0.53 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1648 | 95.9 | -0.62 | -1.23 | 0.644 | 39.3% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.16 |
| Career | 1560 | 106.9 | -2.57 | -0.12 | 0.892 | 47.3% | +7 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.71 | 2–6 (25%) | 2–2 (50%) | 96.3 | +2.25 | Career | 1906 | 137.9 | -0.68 | +1.30 | 0.991 | 49.8% | +7 | -35 | -39 | 50.9% | +0.03 | 73–58 (56%) | 47–31 (60%) | 109.8 | -0.49 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Jie Zheng
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nadia Petrova | 1 | 10 | 11 | Mar 20, 2013 | H2H |
| Svetlana Kuznetsova | 1 | 7 | 8 | May 8, 2013 | H2H |
| Na Li | 3 | 4 | 7 | May 8, 2014 | H2H |
| Maria Kirilenko | 4 | 3 | 7 | Oct 2, 2013 | H2H |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 4 | 2 | 6 | May 24, 2013 | H2H |