Kai-Lin Zhang
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rebecca Peterson | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 21, 2017 | H2H |
| Jana Fett | 1 | 0 | 1 | Sep 20, 2017 | H2H |
| Nao Hibino | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 27, 2017 | H2H |
| Ashleigh Barty | 0 | 1 | 1 | Mar 4, 2017 | H2H |
| Risa Ozaki | 1 | 0 | 1 | Mar 3, 2017 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Kai-Lin Zhang vs Monica Puig H2H: 0-1
Monica Puig holds a 1–0 lead over Kai-Lin Zhang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Monica Puig leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Monica Puig won the 2016 Nottingham Open first round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monica Puig | 6-1 6-1 | Kai-Lin Zhang | Match data | Jun 9, 2016* | R32 | Nottingham Open | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | Olympics | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kai-Lin Zhang | #1,265 | #103 | 611 | 1,560 | 9 | 15 | 37.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Monica Puig | #1,073 | #27 | 1,570 | 1,843 | 139 | 140 | 49.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kai-Lin Zhang | Monica Puig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #191 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #56 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #216 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #59 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #92 | 1,578 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #32 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #58 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #53 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #79 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #105 | 1,623 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1073 | 1,619 | 0 | 2 |
Surface Results by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Kai-Lin Zhang | Monica Puig | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | ||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 2014 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2013 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| 2017 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 11 | 14 | 25 | 44.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 25 | 14 | 39 | 64.1% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 17 | 15 | 32 | 53.1% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 17 | 12 | 29 | 58.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 9 | 14 | 23 | 39.1% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | Career | 91 | 94 | 185 | 49.2% | 34 | 30 | 64 | 53.1% | 14 | 16 | 30 | 46.7% |
Performance Progression by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 21/21 of Kai-Lin Zhang's and 252/279 of Monica Puig's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Kai-Lin Zhang | Monica Puig | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% |
| 2014 | 7/7 | 0.3 | 5.9 | 51.0% | 58.7% | 44.7% | 47.2% | 47.2% | 52.1% | 48.3% | 2011 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 7.0 | 59.8% | 64.5% | 41.2% | 53.8% | 50.0% | 55.1% | 45.8% |
| 2016 | 6/6 | 0.3 | 5.7 | 58.0% | 52.6% | 35.4% | 31.6% | 50.9% | 46.0% | 43.2% | 2012 | 1/2 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 50.0% | 62.5% | 53.1% | 75.0% | 0.0% | 57.8% | 30.0% |
| 2017 | 8/8 | 0.8 | 3.8 | 55.7% | 54.4% | 46.4% | 46.2% | 42.9% | 51.1% | 42.4% | 2013 | 27/28 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 62.4% | 62.4% | 51.4% | 41.8% | 51.2% | 58.1% | 43.0% |
| — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 33/34 | 3.1 | 4.4 | 59.8% | 66.4% | 46.7% | 51.1% | 46.9% | 58.4% | 42.7% |
| — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 32/38 | 4.4 | 4.0 | 60.7% | 65.2% | 51.0% | 50.2% | 49.1% | 59.4% | 38.4% |
| — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 52/65 | 3.1 | 3.6 | 62.0% | 64.8% | 49.8% | 58.7% | 46.5% | 59.0% | 44.7% |
| — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 39/41 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 60.1% | 65.6% | 47.8% | 54.0% | 45.1% | 58.7% | 42.8% |
| — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 31/32 | 3.0 | 3.4 | 61.3% | 67.1% | 45.7% | 52.7% | 48.6% | 58.6% | 42.1% |
| — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 33/35 | 3.3 | 3.6 | 62.5% | 66.1% | 48.0% | 60.1% | 51.9% | 59.1% | 44.1% |
| — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 6.0 | 64.6% | 55.7% | 28.2% | 29.8% | 28.6% | 46.0% | 34.8% |
| — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 60.3% | 51.2% | 33.3% | 53.8% | 33.3% | 44.1% | 32.7% |
| Career | 21/24 | 0.5 | 5.0 | 54.8% | 55.3% | 42.7% | 42.3% | 46.6% | 50.0% | 44.6% | Career | 252/279 | 3.2 | 3.6 | 61.2% | 65.2% | 48.4% | 53.3% | 47.8% | 58.6% | 42.6% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Kai-Lin Zhang | Monica Puig | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 2014 | 1524 | 113.6 | -1.64 | +1.32 | 1.007 | 50.0% | +9 | — | — | 46.7% | -0.07 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.12 | 2011 | 1492 | 103.5 | -1.04 | -2.47 | 1.020 | 50.6% | — | — | — | 33.3% | 0.00 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.15 |
| 2015 | 1519 | 104.8 | — | — | — | — | +7 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.63 | 0–2 | 1–0 | — | -0.05 | 2012 | 1464 | 94.8 | -3.46 | -3.96 | 0.711 | 44.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.17 |
| 2016 | 1475 | 96.0 | -3.89 | -1.11 | 0.800 | 44.7% | +4 | — | — | 35.7% | -1.21 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.26 | 2013 | 1571 | 123.3 | +1.46 | -0.93 | 1.027 | 50.5% | -93 | +68 | +69 | 50.0% | 0.00 | 3–7 (30%) | 5–3 (63%) | 101.7 | +0.09 |
| 2017 | 1519 | 111.7 | -2.40 | -0.65 | 0.869 | 46.8% | +6 | — | — | 42.1% | -0.89 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | +0.45 | 2014 | 1615 | 129.5 | +1.33 | -0.33 | 1.027 | 50.6% | -75 | +119 | 0 | 48.7% | +0.15 | 4–6 (40%) | 4–3 (57%) | 102.0 | -0.29 |
| 2018 | 1511 | 95.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1579 | 121.9 | +0.62 | -2.26 | 0.948 | 49.1% | +9 | +55 | -13 | 42.4% | -0.19 | 3–8 (27%) | 5–11 (31%) | 91.9 | -0.38 |
| 2019 | 1505 | 97.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1771 | 137.9 | +2.19 | +1.46 | 1.092 | 52.0% | -9 | -57 | -89 | 58.9% | +0.70 | 12–5 (71%) | 3–4 (43%) | 108.8 | -0.14 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1724 | 133.3 | +2.17 | -0.36 | 1.036 | 50.7% | +15 | -63 | — | 47.4% | -0.04 | 8–9 (47%) | 5–3 (63%) | 101.4 | -0.88 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1780 | 137.8 | +0.96 | +0.23 | 1.017 | 50.5% | +6 | — | — | 56.5% | +0.25 | 6–5 (55%) | 3–3 (50%) | 101.8 | -0.76 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1686 | 127.3 | +1.69 | +0.90 | 1.076 | 51.5% | -34 | +39 | -64 | 50.0% | +0.35 | 4–8 (33%) | 3–6 (33%) | 92.6 | -0.89 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1624 | 94.4 | -0.47 | -3.91 | 0.644 | 40.5% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -3.40 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.30 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1619 | 101.3 | +0.44 | +1.01 | 0.584 | 39.3% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.14 |
| Career | 1560 | 106.9 | -2.57 | -0.12 | 0.892 | 47.3% | +7 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.71 | 2–6 (25%) | 2–2 (50%) | 96.3 | +2.25 | Career | 1843 | 134.9 | +1.52 | -0.09 | 1.029 | 50.7% | -18 | +21 | -39 | 50.3% | +0.16 | 40–50 (44%) | 29–34 (46%) | 100.5 | -1.10 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Monica Puig
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samantha Stosur | 3 | 4 | 7 | Mar 22, 2018 | H2H |
| Julia Goerges | 3 | 3 | 6 | Oct 19, 2019 | H2H |
| Angelique Kerber | 3 | 3 | 6 | Sep 24, 2019 | H2H |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 3 | 3 | 6 | Sep 27, 2018 | H2H |
| Carla Suárez Navarro | 1 | 5 | 6 | Aug 24, 2018 | H2H |