H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:33 UTC
Karolina Muchova vs Jil Teichmann H2H: 1-2
Jil Teichmann holds a 2–1 lead over Karolina Muchova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jil Teichmann leads 2–0 on clay, while Karolina Muchova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jil Teichmann won the 2026 Roland Garros third round 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 29
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 29
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2026 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Jil Teichmann | 6-1 7-5 | Karolina Muchova | Match data |
| Mar 23, 2023* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Karolina Muchova | 6-0 6-2 | Jil Teichmann | Match data |
| May 4, 2019* | Prague | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Jil Teichmann | 7-6(5) 3-6 6-4 | Karolina Muchova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karolina Muchova | #6 | #6 | 5,168 | 2,128 | 176 | 88 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Jil Teichmann | #119 | #21 | 2,101 | 1,876 | 98 | 107 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karolina Muchova | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #144 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #69 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2019 | 27–13 | 67.5% | #21 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2020 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #27 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #37 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2021 | 18–11 | 62.1% | #32 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #35 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2022 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #151 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #147 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2023 | 36–14 | 72.0% | #8 | 2,004 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2024 | 21–7 | 75.0% | #22 | 2,043 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #123 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2025 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #19 | 1,954 | 0 | 1 | 2026 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #119 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2026 | 34–9 | 79.1% | #6 | 2,108 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |