H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Katerina Siniakova vs Laura Siegemund H2H: 2-1
Katerina Siniakova holds a 2–1 lead over Laura Siegemund in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Laura Siegemund leads 1–0 on clay, while Katerina Siniakova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Katerina Siniakova won the 2023 Jiangxi Open quarterfinal W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2023* | Jiangxi Open | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Katerina Siniakova | (w/o) | Laura Siegemund | Match data |
| Jun 25, 2021* | Bad Homburg | WTA 500 | QF | Grass | Katerina Siniakova | 7-5 6-4 | Laura Siegemund | Match data |
| Jul 24, 2016* | Bastad | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Laura Siegemund | 7-5 6-1 | Katerina Siniakova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Siniakova | #34 | #27 | 1,718 | 1,894 | 227 | 241 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Laura Siegemund | #87 | #27 | 1,630 | 1,828 | 143 | 152 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katerina Siniakova | Laura Siegemund | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #102 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #31 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #58 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2020 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #59 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #49 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #49 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #45 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #98 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #45 | 1,809 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #31 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2025 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #48 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #69 | 1,792 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2026 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #34 | 1,833 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #113 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #75 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #51 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,652 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #86 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #80 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 |