H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Katerina Siniakova vs Lucie Hradecka H2H: 0-1
Lucie Hradecka holds a 1–0 lead over Katerina Siniakova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lucie Hradecka leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lucie Hradecka won the 2015 Prague semifinal 6-2 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 41
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2015* | Prague | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Lucie Hradecka | 6-2 4-6 6-4 | Katerina Siniakova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Siniakova | #34 | #27 | 1,718 | 1,894 | 227 | 241 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Lucie Hradecka | #1,142 | #41 | 1,271 | 1,726 | 92 | 120 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katerina Siniakova | Lucie Hradecka | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #102 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #31 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #58 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #118 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #59 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #64 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #49 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #110 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #49 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #45 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #46 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #45 | 1,809 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #148 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #48 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #34 | 1,833 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #166 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #193 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #567 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |