H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Katerina Siniakova vs Pauline Parmentier H2H: 2-0
Katerina Siniakova holds a 2–0 lead over Pauline Parmentier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Katerina Siniakova leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Katerina Siniakova won the 2017 Madrid second round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 40
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2017 | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Katerina Siniakova | 6-1 6-0 | Pauline Parmentier | Match data |
| Jun 29, 2016* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Katerina Siniakova | 6-3 7-5 | Pauline Parmentier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Siniakova | #34 | #27 | 1,718 | 1,894 | 227 | 241 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Pauline Parmentier | #346 | #40 | 1,121 | 1,702 | 121 | 188 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katerina Siniakova | Pauline Parmentier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #102 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #57 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2018 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #31 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #61 | 1,585 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2019 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #58 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2020 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #59 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #105 | 1,444 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2021 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #49 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #74 | 1,441 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2022 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #49 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #65 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2023 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #45 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #229 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2024 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #45 | 1,809 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #80 | 1,523 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2025 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #48 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #120 | 1,460 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2026 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #34 | 1,833 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #70 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #79 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #56 | 1,682 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #123 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 |