H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Katerina Siniakova vs Tamara Zidansek H2H: 0-3
Tamara Zidansek holds a 3–0 lead over Katerina Siniakova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tamara Zidansek leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Tamara Zidansek won the 2021 Roland Garros third round 0-6 7-6(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 28
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2021* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Tamara Zidansek | 0-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | Katerina Siniakova | Match data |
| Aug 13, 2020* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Tamara Zidansek | 6-3 3-6 6-0 | Katerina Siniakova | Match data |
| May 25, 2019* | Nurnberg | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Tamara Zidansek | 7-6(4) 6-2 | Katerina Siniakova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Siniakova | #34 | #27 | 1,718 | 1,894 | 227 | 241 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Tamara Zidansek | #148 | #22 | 1,991 | 1,800 | 83 | 91 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katerina Siniakova | Tamara Zidansek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #102 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #132 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #79 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #65 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #31 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #58 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #30 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2020 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #59 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #85 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2021 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #49 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2022 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #49 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2024 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2023 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #45 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2024 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #45 | 1,809 | 0 | 5 | 2026 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #148 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2025 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #48 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #34 | 1,833 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |