H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC

Katerina Siniakova vs Venus Williams H2H: 0-2

Venus Williams holds a 2–0 lead over Katerina Siniakova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2017 Toronto third round 7-5 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Katerina Siniakova
CZE Age 30 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 10, 2017* Toronto WTA 1000 R32 Hard Venus Williams #9 7-5 7-5 Katerina Siniakova #40 Match data
May 13, 2015* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Venus Williams #16 6-2 6-2 Katerina Siniakova #69 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Katerina Siniakova #34 #27 1,718 1,894 227 241 48.5% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Katerina Siniakova Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 2013 0–1 0.0% #171 1,488 0 0 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 2014 4–6 40.0% #84 1,520 0 0 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2015 13–20 39.4% #102 1,523 0 0 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2016 18–18 50.0% #52 1,766 0 0 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2017 23–23 50.0% #49 1,696 0 2 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2018 26–22 54.2% #31 1,777 0 2 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2019 20–27 42.6% #58 1,675 0 2 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2020 6–13 31.6% #59 1,702 0 2 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2021 22–17 56.4% #49 1,802 0 2 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2022 17–19 47.2% #49 1,763 0 3 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2023 23–17 57.5% #45 1,828 0 5 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2024 26–25 51.0% #45 1,809 0 5 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2025 17–20 45.9% #48 1,884 0 5 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2026 12–13 48.0% #34 1,833 0 5 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 — — — — — — — 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 — — — — — — — 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 — — — — — — — 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 — — — — — — — 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47