H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Katerina Siniakova vs Yanina Wickmayer H2H: 0-1
Yanina Wickmayer holds a 1–0 lead over Katerina Siniakova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yanina Wickmayer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yanina Wickmayer won the 2015 Tokyo third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 36
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2015* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Yanina Wickmayer | 6-4 6-3 | Katerina Siniakova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Siniakova | #34 | #27 | 1,718 | 1,894 | 227 | 241 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Yanina Wickmayer | #765 | #12 | 3,320 | 1,932 | 218 | 217 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katerina Siniakova | Yanina Wickmayer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #73 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2015 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #102 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2016 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #23 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2017 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2018 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #31 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #23 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2019 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #58 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #51 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2020 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #59 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #75 | 1,556 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2021 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #49 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #41 | 1,684 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2022 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #49 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #58 | 1,574 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2023 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #45 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #115 | 1,624 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2024 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #45 | 1,809 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #122 | 1,637 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2025 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #48 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #152 | 1,560 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2026 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #34 | 1,833 | 0 | 5 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,565 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #321 | 1,554 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #71 | 1,651 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,530 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,500 | 0 | 5 |