H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kateryna Baindl vs Maryna Zanevska H2H: 1-1
Kateryna Baindl and Maryna Zanevska are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Kateryna Baindl won the 2022 Warsaw third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 32
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BEL
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2022* | Warsaw | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Kateryna Baindl | 6-3 6-3 | Maryna Zanevska | Match data |
| Jul 24, 2021* | Gdynia | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Maryna Zanevska | 6-2 4-6 6-3 | Kateryna Baindl | Match data |
| Feb 7, 2016 | St. Petersburg | WTA 500 | Q2 | Hard | Kateryna Baindl | 6-4 0-6 7-6(5) | Maryna Zanevska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kateryna Baindl | #467 | #62 | 922 | 1,730 | 75 | 107 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maryna Zanevska | #1,162 | #62 | 1,015 | 1,797 | 34 | 53 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kateryna Baindl | Maryna Zanevska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #118 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #140 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #128 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #162 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #102 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #122 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #98 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #91 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 9–2 | 81.8% | #82 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #106 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #81 | 1,758 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #144 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #251 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #99 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #132 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #445 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |