H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Katie Boulter vs Kirsten Flipkens H2H: 0-1
Kirsten Flipkens holds a 1–0 lead over Katie Boulter in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kirsten Flipkens leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kirsten Flipkens won the 2018 Beijing second round 4-6 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 29
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 40
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2018 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Kirsten Flipkens | 4-6 6-2 7-5 | Katie Boulter | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katie Boulter | #67 | #23 | 1,931 | 1,861 | 93 | 90 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Kirsten Flipkens | #531 | #13 | 2,961 | 1,829 | 198 | 221 | 47.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katie Boulter | Kirsten Flipkens | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #380 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #202 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #104 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #97 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #319 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #111 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #365 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #81 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #149 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #136 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #192 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #56 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 13–4 | 76.5% | #54 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2024 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #24 | 1,833 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #20 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2025 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #106 | 1,753 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #45 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2026 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #67 | 1,793 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #85 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #65 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #74 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #47 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #71 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #86 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #311 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,685 | 0 | 1 |