H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Katie Boulter vs Rebecca Marino H2H: 3-0
Katie Boulter holds a 3–0 lead over Rebecca Marino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Katie Boulter leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Katie Boulter won the 2025 Australian Open first round 6-4 3-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 29
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2025 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Katie Boulter | 6-4 3-6 7-5 | Rebecca Marino | Match data |
| Jun 14, 2024* | Nottingham | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Katie Boulter | 6-4 6-3 | Rebecca Marino | Match data |
| Aug 9, 2023* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Katie Boulter | 6-3 6-1 | Rebecca Marino | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katie Boulter | #67 | #23 | 1,931 | 1,861 | 93 | 90 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Rebecca Marino | #361 | #38 | 1,322 | 1,726 | 48 | 77 | 38.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katie Boulter | Rebecca Marino | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #356 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #178 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #104 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #64 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #97 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #319 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #365 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2021 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #149 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2022 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #136 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2023 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #56 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2024 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #24 | 1,833 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #215 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2025 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #106 | 1,753 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2026 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #67 | 1,793 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #145 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #63 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #176 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #102 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #178 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |