H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Kim Clijsters vs Na Li H2H: 6-2

Kim Clijsters holds a 6–2 lead over Na Li in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Kim Clijsters leads 5–2 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kim Clijsters won the 2012 Australian Open fourth round 4-6 7-6(6) 6-4.

BEL Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
6 2
8 main draw meetings
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 25, 2012* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Kim Clijsters #14 4-6 7-6(6) 6-4 Na Li #6 Match data
Jan 31, 2011* Australian Open Grand Slam F Hard Kim Clijsters #2 3-6 6-3 6-3 Na Li #7 Match data
Jan 16, 2011* Sydney WTA 500 F Hard Na Li #11 7-6(3) 6-3 Kim Clijsters #3 Match data
Sep 10, 2009* US Open Grand Slam QF Hard Kim Clijsters #5 6-2 6-4 Na Li #19 Match data
Mar 23, 2007* Miami WTA 1000 R16 Hard Na Li #17 4-6 6-4 6-2 Kim Clijsters #5 Match data
Jan 13, 2007* Sydney WTA 500 SF Hard Kim Clijsters #5 6-1 1-6 7-5 Na Li #21 Match data
Jul 6, 2006* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Kim Clijsters #2 6-4 7-5 Na Li #30 Match data
Jan 13, 2006* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Kim Clijsters #2 6-3 6-1 Na Li #54 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kim Clijsters #1,140 #1 8,895 2,275 463 127 78.5% 4 7 3 21 6 41
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,124 334 155 68.3% 2 1 0 2 4 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Clijsters Na Li
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 16–7 69.6% #46 1,724 0 1
17 2000 28–15 65.1% #18 1,911 0 3
18 2001 54–19 74.0% #5 2,030 0 6 2000 1–2 33.3% #136 1,499 0 0
19 2002 50–17 74.6% #4 2,143 0 10 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,483 0 0
20 2003 86–12 87.8% #2 2,260 0 19
21 2004 18–4 81.8% #22 2,188 0 21
22 2005 66–9 88.0% #2 2,215 1 30 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,601 0 1
23 2006 41–12 77.4% #5 2,147 1 33 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,711 0 1
24 2007 14–4 77.8% #5 2,113 1 34 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,801 0 1
25 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,814 0 1
26 2009 13–3 81.2% #18 2,128 2 35 2008 24–12 66.7% #23 1,843 0 2
27 2010 39–7 84.8% #3 2,182 3 40 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,914 0 2
28 2011 21–7 75.0% #13 2,049 4 41 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,844 0 3
29 2012 17–6 73.9% #20 1,989 4 41 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,868 1 5
30 2012 43–16 72.9% #7 2,016 1 6
31 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,077 1 7
32 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,031 2 9
37 2020 0–3 0.0% #1030 1,927 4 41
38 2021 0–2 0.0% #1154 1,881 4 41