H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Kimberly Birrell vs Rebecca Marino H2H: 0-1
Rebecca Marino holds a 1–0 lead over Kimberly Birrell in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rebecca Marino leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rebecca Marino won the 2021 Australian Open first round 6-0 7-6(9).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 28
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2022 | Birmingham | WTA 250 | Q1 | Grass | Rebecca Marino | 6-2 6-4 | Kimberly Birrell | Match data |
| Feb 10, 2021* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Rebecca Marino | 6-0 7-6(9) | Kimberly Birrell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimberly Birrell | #65 | #61 | 999 | 1,835 | 47 | 57 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rebecca Marino | #361 | #38 | 1,322 | 1,726 | 48 | 77 | 38.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kimberly Birrell | Rebecca Marino | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #356 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #516 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #178 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #104 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #64 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #250 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #741 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2023 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #115 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2024 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #113 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #215 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #65 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #145 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #63 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #176 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #102 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #178 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |