Kimberly Birrell
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Vekic | 2 | 2 | 4 | Oct 31, 2025 | H2H |
| Petra Marcinko | 2 | 1 | 3 | Aug 30, 2026 | H2H |
| Ann Li | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 16, 2026 | H2H |
| Victoria Mboko | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 6, 2026 | H2H |
| Anastasia Potapova | 3 | 0 | 3 | Jan 13, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Kimberly Birrell vs Sabine Lisicki
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Kimberly Birrell vs Sabine Lisicki.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
0
0 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sabine Lisicki | 6-3 6-4 | Kimberly Birrell | Match data | Apr 15, 2023 | Q1 | Porsche Tennis Grand Prix | WTA 500 | Clay |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimberly Birrell | #71 | #60 | 999 | 1,834 | 48 | 62 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sabine Lisicki | #502 | #12 | 3,251 | 1,921 | 211 | 176 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kimberly Birrell | Sabine Lisicki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #444 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #516 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #57 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #22 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #175 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2019 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #250 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 35–13 | 72.9% | #15 | 1,878 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #37 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2021 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #741 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #15 | 1,844 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #26 | 1,818 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2023 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #115 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #32 | 1,795 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2024 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #113 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #93 | 1,639 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2025 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #98 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #220 | 1,633 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2026 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #71 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #199 | 1,547 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #562 | 1,478 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #342 | 1,574 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #311 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Kimberly Birrell | Sabine Lisicki | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 14 | 13 | 27 | 51.9% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 15 | 11 | 26 | 57.7% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 19 | 9 | 28 | 67.9% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 11 | 1 | 12 | 91.7% |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% |
| 23 | 2021 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 18 | 11 | 29 | 62.1% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% |
| 24 | 2022 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 19 | 15 | 34 | 55.9% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% |
| 25 | 2023 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2015 | 13 | 12 | 25 | 52.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% |
| 26 | 2024 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2016 | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 27 | 2025 | 13 | 12 | 25 | 52.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2017 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 28 | 2026 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2018 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 40 | 46 | 86 | 46.5% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | — | 128 | 113 | 241 | 53.1% | 38 | 43 | 81 | 46.9% | 45 | 20 | 65 | 69.2% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 93/111 of Kimberly Birrell's and 346/387 of Sabine Lisicki's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Kimberly Birrell | Sabine Lisicki | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 8.0 | 49.4% | 65.8% | 35.9% | 45.5% | 33.3% | 50.6% | 42.0% |
| 17 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 49.0% | 48.0% | 46.2% | 50.0% | 0.0% | 47.1% | 30.4% |
| 18 | 2016 | 3/3 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 62.8% | 47.3% | 53.1% | 47.6% | 50.0% | 50.4% | 31.6% | 2008 | 27/34 | 4.6 | 7.2 | 56.7% | 68.5% | 38.4% | 52.4% | 54.9% | 55.4% | 46.0% |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 41/46 | 4.9 | 6.3 | 54.0% | 70.6% | 44.5% | 47.2% | 52.2% | 58.6% | 44.7% |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 13/13 | 4.5 | 5.5 | 52.1% | 66.4% | 47.9% | 56.4% | 41.1% | 57.5% | 44.1% |
| 21 | 2019 | 5/5 | 2.6 | 4.8 | 62.8% | 63.4% | 36.3% | 60.9% | 38.9% | 53.5% | 39.6% | 2011 | 44/48 | 5.4 | 4.0 | 54.1% | 74.3% | 49.2% | 62.2% | 50.3% | 62.9% | 47.5% |
| 22 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 29/36 | 4.6 | 5.3 | 56.4% | 65.4% | 43.5% | 48.7% | 49.9% | 55.8% | 42.5% |
| 23 | 2021 | 5/5 | 2.6 | 3.6 | 64.2% | 63.4% | 42.2% | 53.1% | 44.5% | 55.8% | 41.1% | 2013 | 51/53 | 5.7 | 3.7 | 55.8% | 71.5% | 47.1% | 57.6% | 46.8% | 60.6% | 44.9% |
| 24 | 2022 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 8.0 | 56.7% | 55.4% | 42.7% | 42.3% | 23.2% | 49.9% | 40.8% | 2014 | 44/48 | 5.3 | 6.0 | 56.2% | 66.5% | 42.2% | 53.2% | 52.3% | 55.9% | 44.9% |
| 25 | 2023 | 18/18 | 1.6 | 4.4 | 60.7% | 62.1% | 44.2% | 52.1% | 49.4% | 55.1% | 45.2% | 2015 | 38/41 | 6.1 | 5.5 | 61.7% | 68.6% | 49.6% | 51.9% | 45.5% | 61.2% | 41.8% |
| 26 | 2024 | 15/15 | 2.2 | 3.5 | 64.0% | 63.3% | 47.4% | 52.6% | 48.1% | 57.6% | 40.8% | 2016 | 30/36 | 4.1 | 5.1 | 56.7% | 65.7% | 45.0% | 54.8% | 50.2% | 57.0% | 42.3% |
| 27 | 2025 | 17/32 | 2.1 | 6.4 | 59.2% | 64.9% | 40.0% | 53.6% | 42.7% | 54.7% | 39.2% | 2017 | 7/10 | 5.0 | 5.3 | 57.0% | 65.3% | 43.1% | 49.3% | 44.1% | 55.9% | 38.7% |
| 28 | 2026 | 28/31 | 1.9 | 5.8 | 63.5% | 62.5% | 40.7% | 48.0% | 56.5% | 54.5% | 41.3% | 2018 | 9/9 | 4.7 | 6.8 | 53.8% | 66.4% | 38.0% | 51.6% | 47.3% | 53.6% | 44.3% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 4/4 | 7.0 | 5.0 | 50.7% | 68.5% | 43.6% | 35.5% | 31.3% | 56.1% | 34.9% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 4/4 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 55.5% | 72.1% | 44.7% | 61.8% | 20.8% | 59.9% | 37.8% |
| 33 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3/3 | 9.0 | 7.3 | 50.8% | 69.6% | 47.4% | 64.9% | 17.8% | 57.6% | 34.6% |
| Career | — | 93/111 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 62.1% | 62.5% | 42.6% | 51.4% | 48.7% | 54.9% | 41.2% | — | 346/387 | 5.2 | 5.3 | 56.0% | 69.0% | 45.2% | 53.8% | 48.5% | 58.5% | 44.0% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Kimberly Birrell | Sabine Lisicki | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1490 | 97.8 | -4.35 | +1.90 | 0.851 | 46.2% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.00 | 0–1 | — | — | 0.00 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1475 | 92.7 | -4.39 | -4.73 | 0.575 | 39.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.17 |
| 18 | 2016 | 1509 | 103.2 | -0.55 | -0.09 | 0.637 | 40.5% | +9 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | — | — | — | -0.35 | 2008 | 1609 | 133.9 | +0.46 | +1.65 | 1.031 | 50.7% | +18 | -91 | — | 48.8% | +0.23 | 6–8 (43%) | 3–4 (43%) | 99.3 | -0.68 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1795 | 142.8 | +2.82 | +1.50 | 1.080 | 51.5% | -77 | -94 | -115 | 67.0% | +1.00 | 5–9 (36%) | 8–5 (62%) | 101.1 | -1.35 |
| 20 | 2018 | 1476 | 98.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1660 | 119.1 | +0.56 | +0.05 | 1.039 | 50.7% | -50 | — | — | 39.1% | -0.35 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–1 | — | +1.00 |
| 21 | 2019 | 1516 | 110.7 | -0.48 | -1.55 | 0.850 | 46.8% | +33 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.33 | 2–0 | 1–0 | — | -0.02 | 2011 | 1878 | 150.7 | +6.12 | +3.41 | 1.281 | 54.9% | -103 | -151 | +55 | 71.6% | +1.55 | 5–4 (56%) | 7–2 (78%) | 107.1 | -1.88 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1720 | 130.9 | +0.96 | +0.55 | 0.960 | 49.3% | -29 | -44 | +213 | 50.0% | -0.14 | 9–9 (50%) | 4–2 (67%) | 99.1 | -0.58 |
| 23 | 2021 | 1518 | 104.1 | -2.12 | -0.93 | 0.929 | 49.0% | +30 | — | — | 36.4% | -1.09 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.48 | 2013 | 1844 | 146.6 | +4.46 | +1.57 | 1.140 | 52.5% | -62 | -114 | +222 | 64.1% | +1.09 | 8–7 (53%) | 6–4 (60%) | 102.7 | -1.08 |
| 24 | 2022 | 1486 | 95.4 | -2.40 | +1.40 | 0.815 | 45.9% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.40 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.14 | 2014 | 1818 | 138.6 | +0.60 | +1.87 | 1.017 | 50.4% | -31 | -117 | +227 | 56.5% | +0.41 | 13–7 (65%) | 3–5 (38%) | 102.1 | -0.86 |
| 25 | 2023 | 1557 | 123.2 | -1.73 | +1.11 | 1.007 | 50.1% | +43 | -88 | — | 46.2% | -0.08 | 1–2 (33%) | 3–2 (60%) | 100.5 | +0.87 | 2015 | 1795 | 140.5 | +2.78 | +0.69 | 1.077 | 51.3% | +8 | -130 | +203 | 55.2% | +0.35 | 5–11 (31%) | 9–9 (50%) | 94.4 | -0.18 |
| 26 | 2024 | 1689 | 122.0 | +0.40 | -1.41 | 0.962 | 49.5% | +9 | — | -77 | 43.3% | -0.43 | 1–1 | 0–4 (0%) | — | +0.83 | 2016 | 1640 | 122.1 | +0.47 | -0.96 | 0.982 | 49.4% | +15 | -29 | +307 | 46.3% | -0.07 | 1–8 (11%) | 1–7 (13%) | 85.1 | +0.16 |
| 27 | 2025 | 1679 | 134.0 | -1.71 | -2.60 | 0.866 | 46.9% | +54 | -259 | -143 | 44.7% | -0.36 | 6–6 (50%) | 5–6 (45%) | 97.7 | -0.02 | 2017 | 1634 | 104.3 | -1.13 | -0.41 | 0.878 | 47.6% | +5 | — | +286 | 50.0% | -0.55 | 1–3 (25%) | 5–1 (83%) | 101.0 | +0.09 |
| 28 | 2026 | 1695 | 133.4 | -1.46 | -0.89 | 0.908 | 48.1% | +45 | -271 | -78 | 42.7% | -0.55 | 7–8 (47%) | 3–7 (30%) | 96.3 | -0.67 | 2018 | 1547 | 109.2 | -1.76 | -0.60 | 0.954 | 48.7% | +1 | — | — | 47.6% | -0.28 | 3–0 (100%) | 1–1 | — | +0.66 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1478 | 99.2 | +1.15 | -1.10 | 0.795 | 44.9% | — | +20 | — | 11.1% | -2.22 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.75 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1519 | 101.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1575 | 103.5 | -0.52 | -1.10 | 0.944 | 48.2% | — | — | +332 | 44.4% | -0.44 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | +0.47 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1569 | 105.0 | -1.38 | +0.08 | 0.816 | 46.0% | — | — | — | 14.3% | -1.71 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.05 |
| Career | — | 1835 | 128.4 | -1.23 | -0.86 | 0.914 | 48.2% | +39 | -206 | -98 | 43.7% | -0.46 | 19–17 (53%) | 12–20 (38%) | 96.8 | +1.15 | — | 1922 | 140.4 | +2.23 | +1.19 | 1.059 | 51.1% | -33 | -94 | +169 | 55.9% | +0.44 | 57–72 (44%) | 48–43 (53%) | 98.5 | -1.28 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Sabine Lisicki
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samantha Stosur | 3 | 5 | 8 | Jun 30, 2016 | H2H |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 2 | 5 | 7 | Oct 20, 2016 | H2H |
| Jelena Jankovic | 1 | 6 | 7 | Sep 23, 2016 | H2H |
| Maria Sharapova | 1 | 6 | 7 | Aug 31, 2014 | H2H |
| Monica Niculescu | 3 | 3 | 6 | Feb 3, 2018 | H2H |