H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Kirsten Flipkens vs Eleni Daniilidou H2H: 1-0

Kirsten Flipkens holds a 1–0 lead over Eleni Daniilidou in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kirsten Flipkens leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kirsten Flipkens won the 2011 Fes round of 16 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kirsten Flipkens
Belgium Age 40 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Eleni Daniilidou
GRE Age 43 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kirsten Flipkens #104 6-4 7-5 Eleni Daniilidou #168 Match data Apr 22, 2011* R16 Fes International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kirsten Flipkens #531 #13 2,961 1,830 200 221 47.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Eleni Daniilidou #1,070 #14 1,639 1,878 187 206 47.6% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kirsten Flipkens Eleni Daniilidou
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 0–2 0.0% #380 1,485 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #314 1,490 0 0
18 2004 2–2 50.0% #168 1,500 0 0 2001 5–8 38.5% #81 1,499 0 0
19 2005 1–2 33.3% #202 1,497 0 0 2002 32–22 59.3% #22 1,778 0 1
20 2006 3–5 37.5% #104 1,523 0 0 2003 32–24 57.1% #26 1,706 0 2
21 2007 0–2 0.0% #287 1,506 0 0 2004 23–20 53.5% #34 1,716 0 3
22 2008 1–2 33.3% #111 1,500 0 0 2005 14–20 41.2% #69 1,648 0 3
23 2009 8–10 44.4% #81 1,585 0 0 2006 27–24 52.9% #36 1,722 0 4
24 2010 15–15 50.0% #77 1,667 0 0 2007 27–29 48.2% #42 1,720 0 4
25 2011 5–9 35.7% #192 1,608 0 0 2008 8–9 47.1% #144 1,667 0 5
26 2012 13–4 76.5% #54 1,763 0 1 2009 0–1 0.0% #157 1,646 0 5
27 2013 32–23 58.2% #20 1,735 0 1 2010 2–3 40.0% #165 1,640 0 5
28 2014 23–26 46.9% #45 1,651 0 1 2011 6–12 33.3% #90 1,553 0 5
29 2015 14–17 45.2% #85 1,656 0 1 2012 8–21 27.6% #100 1,479 0 5
30 2016 23–21 52.3% #65 1,657 0 1 2013 3–10 23.1% #186 1,427 0 5
31 2017 16–20 44.4% #74 1,698 0 1 2014 0–2 0.0% #414 1,409 0 5
32 2018 21–20 51.2% #47 1,662 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2019 15–22 40.5% #71 1,748 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2020 2–8 20.0% #86 1,703 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2021 1–6 14.3% #311 1,658 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2022 5–5 50.0% #251 1,686 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kirsten Flipkens Eleni Daniilidou
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
19 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 14 11 25 56.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 11 2 13 84.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 2006 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2003 17 13 30 56.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 2007 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 21 12 33 63.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2008 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2005 7 12 19 36.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2009 5 4 9 55.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2006 20 15 35 57.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
24 2010 9 7 16 56.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2007 19 18 37 51.4% 4 7 11 36.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2011 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2008 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2012 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2013 19 15 34 55.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 2010 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2014 15 18 33 45.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 2011 4 8 12 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 2015 13 14 27 48.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2012 7 13 20 35.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
30 2016 18 14 32 56.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2013 3 9 12 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2017 10 13 23 43.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2014 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2018 9 13 22 40.9% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 12 13 25 48.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 128 139 267 47.9% 23 47 70 32.9% 47 33 80 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% — 124 127 251 49.4% 26 46 72 36.1% 31 24 55 56.4% 6 9 15 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 387/412 of Kirsten Flipkens's and 168/325 of Eleni Daniilidou's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Kirsten Flipkens Eleni Daniilidou
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2006 3/8 2.7 1.3 65.0% 53.8% 37.1% 54.3% 31.8% 48.0% 44.3% 2003 6/56 1.3 5.2 66.6% 63.7% 40.6% 60.1% 43.4% 55.8% 44.2%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 8/43 1.8 5.9 69.5% 64.1% 42.1% 62.4% 44.6% 57.6% 47.8%
22 2008 2/3 0.5 2.0 59.3% 59.1% 24.3% 42.2% 26.7% 45.8% 41.5% 2005 9/34 1.3 5.6 65.2% 58.9% 42.6% 44.5% 44.1% 52.2% 43.3%
23 2009 17/18 2.7 2.9 59.3% 62.6% 40.8% 48.1% 45.0% 54.0% 42.6% 2006 19/51 0.8 5.1 69.1% 60.0% 46.4% 42.5% 48.0% 56.0% 46.7%
24 2010 30/30 3.1 2.3 58.3% 64.8% 45.9% 53.9% 45.2% 56.8% 41.2% 2007 51/56 0.7 5.7 69.8% 59.2% 38.2% 50.7% 51.7% 52.8% 44.3%
25 2011 13/14 2.7 3.5 57.3% 63.2% 43.7% 57.8% 46.1% 55.1% 42.9% 2008 14/17 1.2 4.9 64.4% 57.6% 32.9% 33.2% 66.8% 48.9% 42.0%
26 2012 16/17 3.8 4.0 58.0% 70.9% 48.0% 57.4% 37.4% 61.4% 42.1% 2009 1/1 1.0 2.0 61.6% 49.1% 48.5% 27.3% 66.7% 48.8% 46.8%
27 2013 53/55 3.8 3.3 55.0% 67.0% 46.4% 47.5% 44.1% 57.4% 42.3% 2010 5/5 1.6 5.6 63.1% 59.9% 46.5% 49.4% 39.8% 54.8% 42.1%
28 2014 47/49 3.5 3.0 57.2% 65.2% 47.6% 54.2% 48.6% 57.5% 39.8% 2011 16/18 0.8 5.9 64.1% 59.1% 41.2% 46.5% 45.1% 52.4% 44.0%
29 2015 25/31 2.7 2.4 61.2% 62.2% 46.6% 49.6% 42.2% 56.2% 40.2% 2012 26/29 1.5 5.7 64.5% 58.1% 41.4% 45.5% 40.1% 52.2% 39.0%
30 2016 41/45 2.2 2.1 60.8% 62.0% 47.5% 53.5% 46.8% 56.7% 41.6% 2013 11/13 1.6 8.9 65.2% 59.8% 31.4% 48.6% 32.2% 49.8% 39.0%
31 2017 36/36 2.5 2.3 58.5% 64.4% 46.1% 43.2% 46.2% 57.0% 43.6% 2014 2/2 0.0 6.5 71.6% 53.6% 16.9% 27.3% 41.7% 43.1% 38.2%
32 2018 40/41 3.1 2.4 61.2% 61.6% 46.0% 52.8% 46.2% 55.5% 41.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 37/37 2.3 1.9 63.8% 62.3% 45.3% 50.6% 45.7% 56.2% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 10/10 1.2 1.6 63.6% 58.1% 48.0% 52.8% 43.6% 54.2% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 7/8 2.1 3.7 61.0% 58.5% 40.3% 41.5% 46.7% 50.9% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 10/10 0.9 1.7 67.3% 60.5% 49.2% 61.5% 56.7% 57.2% 47.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 387/423 2.8 2.6 59.5% 63.7% 46.0% 51.2% 45.4% 56.5% 41.5% — 168/393 1.1 5.8 67.0% 59.3% 39.6% 47.1% 47.4% 52.7% 43.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kirsten Flipkens Eleni Daniilidou
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2003 1485 100.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.19 2000 1491 97.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.02
18 2004 1501 103.9 — — — — +9 — — 50.0% +0.30 1–1 — — +0.24 2001 1500 107.9 — — — — +36 -22 +106 40.0% -0.37 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.52
19 2005 1498 105.8 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.29 0–1 0–1 — -0.08 2002 1778 141.4 — — — — -106 -221 +113 58.6% +0.69 9–11 (45%) 5–6 (45%) 100.1 -1.37
20 2006 1523 111.2 -1.18 +0.01 0.852 46.1% +11 — — 33.3% -1.40 0–1 0–1 — -0.18 2003 1706 136.7 +0.41 +0.45 1.001 50.0% +5 -93 +150 56.7% +0.20 7–8 (47%) 10–2 (83%) 102.0 +1.38
21 2007 1507 102.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.07 2004 1717 141.0 +1.29 +1.68 1.128 52.6% +42 -116 — 55.9% +0.45 7–6 (54%) 6–4 (60%) 101.4 +1.59
22 2008 1501 100.2 -2.32 -1.45 0.765 44.3% — +27 — 42.9% -1.29 0–1 1–0 — -0.12 2005 1648 126.9 -1.18 +0.37 0.906 47.8% +10 -104 +191 44.2% -0.49 7–6 (54%) 3–5 (38%) 97.5 -2.10
23 2009 1586 116.7 -0.97 -0.24 0.926 48.3% +5 -93 +32 47.5% -0.53 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -0.04 2006 1723 136.1 +0.35 +1.65 1.061 51.1% +25 -187 +90 54.0% +0.18 8–9 (47%) 3–4 (43%) 97.2 -2.71
24 2010 1667 124.4 +0.74 -1.97 0.953 49.3% +1 -196 -29 47.5% -0.08 2–1 (67%) 2–5 (29%) 98.7 -0.67 2007 1720 130.6 -2.20 +0.32 0.938 48.6% +11 -224 +88 47.2% -0.16 13–10 (57%) 9–6 (60%) 104.4 +0.19
25 2011 1609 108.8 -0.87 +0.27 0.955 49.4% — -120 -12 40.0% -0.30 0–2 0–3 (0%) — -0.23 2008 1668 121.0 -3.18 -0.53 0.821 46.1% -1 — — 46.7% -0.50 2–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.67
26 2012 1764 133.9 +3.97 +0.08 1.090 51.7% -13 — -74 66.7% +0.80 5–2 (71%) 5–1 (83%) 107.2 -1.41 2009 1647 100.7 +1.13 +0.09 0.915 47.9% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.05
27 2013 1735 136.6 +1.70 -1.26 0.991 49.8% 0 -224 +115 54.5% +0.16 16–8 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 107.8 -0.44 2010 1641 109.4 -1.18 -1.96 0.933 48.3% +16 — — 40.0% -0.70 — 1–0 — -0.22
28 2014 1652 129.3 +1.48 -2.49 0.936 48.8% -5 -166 +182 46.6% -0.27 10–10 (50%) 8–6 (57%) 98.7 +0.12 2011 1554 103.4 -2.59 +0.59 0.925 48.1% +34 -96 — 38.1% -0.95 2–4 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 98.9 +0.84
29 2015 1656 124.6 -1.18 -1.79 0.917 48.2% +21 — +130 48.0% -0.43 5–8 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 98.8 -0.66 2012 1479 112.0 -2.35 -3.57 0.817 45.6% +54 -42 +181 33.3% -1.22 4–5 (44%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.19
30 2016 1658 119.0 +0.35 -0.93 0.960 49.2% -1 -246 +115 48.5% -0.16 9–6 (60%) 10–2 (83%) 106.9 -1.36 2013 1428 100.8 -3.67 -2.11 0.776 44.5% +39 — — 28.1% -1.81 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +0.45
31 2017 1699 128.1 +0.11 -0.15 1.013 50.4% -4 -255 +100 41.8% -0.39 6–7 (46%) 3–4 (43%) 99.0 -1.41 2014 1409 94.6 -1.70 -2.31 0.671 40.6% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.03
32 2018 1663 118.7 -0.95 -1.14 0.933 48.7% -55 -87 +165 48.4% -0.26 11–4 (73%) 9–5 (64%) 109.6 -0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1748 129.2 -0.43 -2.68 0.920 48.4% +19 -247 +41 42.0% -0.39 5–4 (56%) 2–4 (33%) 100.5 -0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1703 122.1 -2.05 -2.49 0.817 46.2% +37 — — 30.4% -1.48 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 96.7 -0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1659 113.2 -2.24 -2.56 0.769 44.6% +16 — — 26.7% -2.00 1–2 (33%) — — -0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 1686 119.2 +0.87 +1.49 1.103 52.2% — — +160 52.0% +0.56 2–3 (40%) — — +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1830 130.1 +0.30 -1.31 0.953 49.1% 0 -164 +89 46.9% -0.26 74–67 (52%) 55–44 (56%) 103.6 -2.10 — 1878 134.3 -1.78 -0.36 0.913 48.0% +9 -146 +126 48.9% -0.13 64–65 (50%) 44–34 (56%) 102.2 -0.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.