H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Kirsten Flipkens vs Laura Robson H2H: 2-0

Kirsten Flipkens holds a 2–0 lead over Laura Robson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kirsten Flipkens leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kirsten Flipkens won the 2016 Miami Open first round 7-6(4) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kirsten Flipkens
Belgium Age 40 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Laura Robson
Great Britain Age 32 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kirsten Flipkens #65 7-6(4) 6-2 Laura Robson #504 Match data Mar 24, 2016* R128 Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Kirsten Flipkens #19 6-3 6-0 Laura Robson #48 Match data Jan 15, 2014* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kirsten Flipkens #531 #13 2,961 1,830 200 221 47.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Laura Robson #764 #27 1,685 1,710 39 63 38.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kirsten Flipkens Laura Robson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #517 1,489 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2009 0–1 0.0% #403 1,484 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2010 1–5 16.7% #217 1,474 0 0
17 2003 0–2 0.0% #380 1,485 0 0 2011 3–5 37.5% #133 1,508 0 0
18 2004 2–2 50.0% #168 1,500 0 0 2012 16–15 51.6% #53 1,657 0 0
19 2005 1–2 33.3% #202 1,497 0 0 2013 18–22 45.0% #44 1,661 0 0
20 2006 3–5 37.5% #104 1,523 0 0 2014 0–2 0.0% #916 1,630 0 0
21 2007 0–2 0.0% #287 1,506 0 0 2015 0–2 0.0% #557 1,594 0 0
22 2008 1–2 33.3% #111 1,500 0 0 2016 1–8 11.1% #222 1,512 0 0
23 2009 8–10 44.4% #81 1,585 0 0 2017 0–2 0.0% #229 1,465 0 0
24 2010 15–15 50.0% #77 1,667 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2011 5–9 35.7% #192 1,608 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2012 13–4 76.5% #54 1,763 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 2013 32–23 58.2% #20 1,735 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2014 23–26 46.9% #45 1,651 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2015 14–17 45.2% #85 1,656 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2016 23–21 52.3% #65 1,657 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2017 16–20 44.4% #74 1,698 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2018 21–20 51.2% #47 1,662 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2019 15–22 40.5% #71 1,748 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2020 2–8 20.0% #86 1,703 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2021 1–6 14.3% #311 1,658 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2022 5–5 50.0% #251 1,686 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kirsten Flipkens Laura Robson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
17 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
18 2004 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 10 8 18 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
19 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 10 13 23 43.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
20 2006 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2008 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
23 2009 5 4 9 55.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2017 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2010 9 7 16 56.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2012 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2013 19 15 34 55.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 15 18 33 45.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 13 14 27 48.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 18 14 32 56.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 10 13 23 43.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 9 13 22 40.9% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 12 13 25 48.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 128 139 267 47.9% 23 47 70 32.9% 47 33 80 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% — 22 33 55 40.0% 8 12 20 40.0% 9 18 27 33.3% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 387/412 of Kirsten Flipkens's and 95/101 of Laura Robson's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Kirsten Flipkens Laura Robson
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 1/1 10.0 14.0 59.6% 66.1% 42.1% 61.5% 50.0% 56.4% 37.8%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 6/6 4.7 4.0 63.7% 69.3% 38.8% 68.2% 31.9% 58.6% 30.7%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 8/8 2.4 5.8 54.8% 65.8% 40.9% 41.9% 43.5% 54.4% 42.4%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 28/31 4.2 5.8 57.1% 68.1% 44.4% 51.4% 44.3% 57.9% 43.5%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 37/40 4.5 5.8 55.6% 69.7% 43.4% 54.0% 44.4% 58.0% 42.6%
20 2006 3/8 2.7 1.3 65.0% 53.8% 37.1% 54.3% 31.8% 48.0% 44.3% 2014 2/2 4.0 3.5 59.1% 55.8% 36.7% 41.7% 50.0% 47.7% 34.7%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 2/2 5.0 11.0 57.6% 68.6% 35.7% 66.4% 34.1% 54.9% 38.1%
22 2008 2/3 0.5 2.0 59.3% 59.1% 24.3% 42.2% 26.7% 45.8% 41.5% 2016 9/9 2.8 5.3 56.5% 58.2% 41.5% 51.8% 36.2% 51.0% 38.0%
23 2009 17/18 2.7 2.9 59.3% 62.6% 40.8% 48.1% 45.0% 54.0% 42.6% 2017 2/2 2.5 4.5 58.7% 66.8% 43.5% 21.4% 3.6% 57.1% 34.4%
24 2010 30/30 3.1 2.3 58.3% 64.8% 45.9% 53.9% 45.2% 56.8% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 13/14 2.7 3.5 57.3% 63.2% 43.7% 57.8% 46.1% 55.1% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2012 16/17 3.8 4.0 58.0% 70.9% 48.0% 57.4% 37.4% 61.4% 42.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2013 53/55 3.8 3.3 55.0% 67.0% 46.4% 47.5% 44.1% 57.4% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 47/49 3.5 3.0 57.2% 65.2% 47.6% 54.2% 48.6% 57.5% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 25/31 2.7 2.4 61.2% 62.2% 46.6% 49.6% 42.2% 56.2% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 41/45 2.2 2.1 60.8% 62.0% 47.5% 53.5% 46.8% 56.7% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 36/36 2.5 2.3 58.5% 64.4% 46.1% 43.2% 46.2% 57.0% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 40/41 3.1 2.4 61.2% 61.6% 46.0% 52.8% 46.2% 55.5% 41.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 37/37 2.3 1.9 63.8% 62.3% 45.3% 50.6% 45.7% 56.2% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 10/10 1.2 1.6 63.6% 58.1% 48.0% 52.8% 43.6% 54.2% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 7/8 2.1 3.7 61.0% 58.5% 40.3% 41.5% 46.7% 50.9% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 10/10 0.9 1.7 67.3% 60.5% 49.2% 61.5% 56.7% 57.2% 47.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 387/423 2.8 2.6 59.5% 63.7% 46.0% 51.2% 45.4% 56.5% 41.5% — 95/102 4.1 5.8 56.8% 67.4% 42.7% 52.3% 41.8% 56.8% 41.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kirsten Flipkens Laura Robson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1490 101.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.05
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1484 103.3 -0.52 +0.53 0.867 47.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.12
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1474 102.2 +0.56 -5.19 0.742 45.8% — — +98 0.0% -2.40 — 0–1 — -0.50
17 2003 1485 100.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.19 2011 1508 110.8 +0.58 -0.57 0.932 48.6% +1 — +42 26.7% -1.00 1–0 1–1 — +0.08
18 2004 1501 103.9 — — — — +9 — — 50.0% +0.30 1–1 — — +0.24 2012 1658 135.1 +1.17 +0.07 1.034 51.0% -32 -64 -60 52.2% +0.28 4–5 (44%) 4–5 (44%) 102.4 -0.14
19 2005 1498 105.8 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.29 0–1 0–1 — -0.08 2013 1662 129.1 +1.89 -0.67 1.015 50.1% -53 -51 -31 46.2% -0.04 6–7 (46%) 3–9 (25%) 96.6 -0.17
20 2006 1523 111.2 -1.18 +0.01 0.852 46.1% +11 — — 33.3% -1.40 0–1 0–1 — -0.18 2014 1630 100.1 -4.77 -2.42 0.663 41.7% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.11
21 2007 1507 102.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.07 2015 1595 101.1 -0.86 -1.36 0.846 46.6% — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 — — +0.19
22 2008 1501 100.2 -2.32 -1.45 0.765 44.3% — +27 — 42.9% -1.29 0–1 1–0 — -0.12 2016 1512 105.4 -2.56 -1.79 0.776 45.0% +6 +50 — 15.8% -2.10 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.25
23 2009 1586 116.7 -0.97 -0.24 0.926 48.3% +5 -93 +32 47.5% -0.53 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -0.04 2017 1465 96.8 -2.08 -0.78 0.802 45.2% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.18
24 2010 1667 124.4 +0.74 -1.97 0.953 49.3% +1 -196 -29 47.5% -0.08 2–1 (67%) 2–5 (29%) 98.7 -0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 1609 108.8 -0.87 +0.27 0.955 49.4% — -120 -12 40.0% -0.30 0–2 0–3 (0%) — -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2012 1764 133.9 +3.97 +0.08 1.090 51.7% -13 — -74 66.7% +0.80 5–2 (71%) 5–1 (83%) 107.2 -1.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2013 1735 136.6 +1.70 -1.26 0.991 49.8% 0 -224 +115 54.5% +0.16 16–8 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 107.8 -0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 1652 129.3 +1.48 -2.49 0.936 48.8% -5 -166 +182 46.6% -0.27 10–10 (50%) 8–6 (57%) 98.7 +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 1656 124.6 -1.18 -1.79 0.917 48.2% +21 — +130 48.0% -0.43 5–8 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 98.8 -0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 1658 119.0 +0.35 -0.93 0.960 49.2% -1 -246 +115 48.5% -0.16 9–6 (60%) 10–2 (83%) 106.9 -1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 1699 128.1 +0.11 -0.15 1.013 50.4% -4 -255 +100 41.8% -0.39 6–7 (46%) 3–4 (43%) 99.0 -1.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1663 118.7 -0.95 -1.14 0.933 48.7% -55 -87 +165 48.4% -0.26 11–4 (73%) 9–5 (64%) 109.6 -0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1748 129.2 -0.43 -2.68 0.920 48.4% +19 -247 +41 42.0% -0.39 5–4 (56%) 2–4 (33%) 100.5 -0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1703 122.1 -2.05 -2.49 0.817 46.2% +37 — — 30.4% -1.48 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 96.7 -0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1659 113.2 -2.24 -2.56 0.769 44.6% +16 — — 26.7% -2.00 1–2 (33%) — — -0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 1686 119.2 +0.87 +1.49 1.103 52.2% — — +160 52.0% +0.56 2–3 (40%) — — +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1830 130.1 +0.30 -1.31 0.953 49.1% 0 -164 +89 46.9% -0.26 74–67 (52%) 55–44 (56%) 103.6 -2.10 — 1710 126.6 +0.75 -0.88 0.952 49.1% -36 -35 -6 39.8% -0.43 11–16 (41%) 9–18 (33%) 96.1 -0.87

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.