H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Kirsten Flipkens vs Serena Williams H2H: 0-1

Serena Williams holds a 1–0 lead over Kirsten Flipkens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Serena Williams leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Serena Williams won the 2013 Toronto fourth round 6-0 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kirsten Flipkens
BEL Age 40 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 5, 2013 Toronto WTA 1000 R16 Hard Serena Williams #1 6-0 6-3 Kirsten Flipkens #13 Match data

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kirsten Flipkens #531 #13 2,961 1,829 198 221 47.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kirsten Flipkens Serena Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0
17 2003 0–2 0.0% #380 1,485 0 0 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4
18 2004 2–2 50.0% #168 1,500 0 0 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7
19 2005 1–2 33.3% #202 1,498 0 0 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10
20 2006 3–5 37.5% #104 1,523 0 0 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18
21 2007 0–2 0.0% #287 1,507 0 0 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22
22 2008 1–2 33.3% #111 1,501 0 0 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24
23 2009 8–10 44.4% #81 1,587 0 0 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25
24 2010 15–15 50.0% #77 1,666 0 0 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25
25 2011 5–9 35.7% #192 1,608 0 0 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27
26 2012 13–4 76.5% #54 1,762 0 1 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31
27 2013 32–23 58.2% #20 1,734 0 1 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34
28 2014 23–26 46.9% #45 1,657 0 1 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36
29 2015 14–17 45.2% #85 1,657 0 1 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38
30 2016 21–20 51.2% #65 1,642 0 1 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44
31 2017 16–21 43.2% #74 1,695 0 1 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55
32 2018 21–20 51.2% #47 1,660 0 1 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62
33 2019 15–22 40.5% #71 1,747 0 1 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67
34 2020 2–8 20.0% #86 1,703 0 1 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69
35 2021 1–6 14.3% #311 1,659 0 1 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70
36 2022 5–5 50.0% #251 1,685 0 1 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70
37 — — — — — — — 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70
38 — — — — — — — 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71
39 — — — — — — — 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71
40 — — — — — — — 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71
44 — — — — — — — 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 — 23 71