H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:30 UTC
Kristina Mladenovic vs Daria Saville H2H: 1-2
Daria Saville holds a 2–1 lead over Kristina Mladenovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Daria Saville leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Daria Saville won the 2017 Cincinnati second round 6-0 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 33
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 32
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2017* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Daria Saville | 6-0 7-6(6) | Kristina Mladenovic | Match data |
| Oct 15, 2016* | Hong Kong | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Kristina Mladenovic | 7-5 6-3 | Daria Saville | Match data |
| Jan 24, 2016* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Daria Saville | 6-4 4-6 11-9 | Kristina Mladenovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristina Mladenovic | #395 | #10 | 3,155 | 1,926 | 212 | 232 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Daria Saville | #226 | #20 | 2,135 | 1,836 | 156 | 153 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kristina Mladenovic | Daria Saville | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2009 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #539 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #300 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2012 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #55 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #67 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #29 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #25 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2017 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #11 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #35 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2018 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #43 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #242 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2019 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #39 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #450 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2020 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #50 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #419 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2021 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #86 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #53 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #152 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #204 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,432 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #108 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,442 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #197 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |