H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kristyna Pliskova vs Garbiñe Muguruza H2H: 0-1
Garbiñe Muguruza holds a 1–0 lead over Kristyna Pliskova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Garbiñe Muguruza leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Garbiñe Muguruza won the 2020 Roland Garros second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 34
Left-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 32
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2020* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Garbiñe Muguruza | 6-3 6-2 | Kristyna Pliskova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristyna Pliskova | #446 | #35 | 1,343 | 1,756 | 94 | 139 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Garbiñe Muguruza | #1,129 | #1 | 6,766 | 2,067 | 306 | 178 | 63.2% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kristyna Pliskova | Garbiñe Muguruza | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #854 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #748 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #109 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #176 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #63 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #20 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2013 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #130 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #3 | 1,950 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2014 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #121 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #7 | 1,837 | 1 | 3 |
| 23 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 46–19 | 70.8% | #2 | 1,932 | 2 | 5 |
| 24 | 2016 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #60 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #18 | 1,841 | 2 | 6 |
| 25 | 2017 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #36 | 1,814 | 2 | 7 |
| 26 | 2018 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 23–8 | 74.2% | #15 | 1,933 | 2 | 7 |
| 27 | 2019 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #67 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #3 | 2,023 | 2 | 10 |
| 28 | 2020 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #69 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #55 | 1,783 | 2 | 10 |
| 29 | 2021 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1081 | 1,729 | 2 | 10 |