H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kristyna Pliskova vs Kai-Chen Chang H2H: 2-0
Kristyna Pliskova holds a 2–0 lead over Kai-Chen Chang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kristyna Pliskova leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kristyna Pliskova won the 2017 Japan Women's Open Tennis third round 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 34
Left-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
TPE
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2017* | Japan Women's Open Tennis | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Kristyna Pliskova | 7-5 7-5 | Kai-Chen Chang | Match data |
| Jan 5, 2017* | Shenzhen | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Kristyna Pliskova | 6-1 6-2 | Kai-Chen Chang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristyna Pliskova | #446 | #35 | 1,343 | 1,756 | 94 | 139 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kai-Chen Chang | #1,233 | #82 | 808 | 1,647 | 32 | 59 | 35.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kristyna Pliskova | Kai-Chen Chang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #854 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #748 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #148 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #176 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #86 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #621 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #130 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #121 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #219 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #60 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #401 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #67 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #69 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |