H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Kurumi Nara vs Daniela Hantuchova H2H: 1-1

Kurumi Nara and Daniela Hantuchova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Kurumi Nara won the 2016 Kuala Lumpur first round 6-4 6-7(4) 7-6(10).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kurumi Nara
Japan Age 34 Right-Handed 155 cm / 5'1"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Daniela Hantuchova
SVK Age 43 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kurumi Nara #82 6-4 6-7(4) 7-6(10) Daniela Hantuchova #170 Match data Mar 3, 2016* R32 Kuala Lumpur International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Daniela Hantuchova #32 6-2 6-1 Kurumi Nara #130 Match data Feb 10, 2011* R32 Pattaya International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kurumi Nara #246 #32 1,412 1,700 82 118 41.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Daniela Hantuchova #317 #5 2,897 1,968 461 365 55.8% 0 2 0 1 4 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kurumi Nara Daniela Hantuchova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1999 0–1 0.0% #197 1,494 0 0
17 2009 1–1 50.0% #181 1,512 0 0 2000 6–7 46.2% #108 1,550 0 0
18 2010 1–7 12.5% #130 1,475 0 0 2001 19–16 54.3% #38 1,710 0 0
19 2011 1–4 20.0% #140 1,457 0 0 2002 48–24 66.7% #8 1,919 0 1
20 2012 1–3 25.0% #148 1,438 0 0 2003 26–23 53.1% #19 1,751 0 1
21 2013 5–6 45.5% #81 1,506 0 0 2004 25–25 50.0% #31 1,710 0 1
22 2014 23–21 52.3% #44 1,651 0 1 2005 38–25 60.3% #19 1,863 0 1
23 2015 19–22 46.3% #81 1,586 0 1 2006 35–25 58.3% #17 1,837 0 1
24 2016 15–18 45.5% #77 1,602 0 1 2007 52–26 66.7% #9 1,932 0 3
25 2017 10–16 38.5% #102 1,577 0 1 2008 22–20 52.4% #21 1,757 0 3
26 2018 0–14 0.0% #161 1,485 0 1 2009 37–24 60.7% #24 1,809 0 3
27 2019 3–3 50.0% #140 1,565 0 1 2010 32–24 57.1% #30 1,781 0 3
28 2020 0–1 0.0% #160 1,559 0 1 2011 41–25 62.1% #24 1,791 0 4
29 2021 3–2 60.0% #185 1,512 0 1 2012 24–23 51.1% #32 1,692 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 2013 23–24 48.9% #33 1,683 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 2014 16–24 40.0% #62 1,571 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2015 15–19 44.1% #83 1,572 0 7
33 — — — — — — — 2016 1–9 10.0% #228 1,514 0 7
34 — — — — — — — 2017 1–1 50.0% #317 1,526 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kurumi Nara Daniela Hantuchova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2009 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1%
18 2010 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2001 4 8 12 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 5 2 7 71.4%
19 2011 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 28 13 41 68.3% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
20 2012 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 12 12 24 50.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
21 2013 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 13 14 27 48.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 2014 15 13 28 53.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2005 31 17 48 64.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
23 2015 14 15 29 48.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2006 26 18 44 59.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2016 13 11 24 54.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2007 36 18 54 66.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2017 8 13 21 38.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2008 20 17 37 54.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2018 0 10 10 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2009 23 15 38 60.5% 8 6 14 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2019 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 24 18 42 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 20 16 36 55.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — —
29 2021 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2012 21 19 40 52.5% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 15 17 32 46.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 5 15 20 25.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 11 12 23 47.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 6 6 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 60 83 143 42.0% 15 19 34 44.1% 7 16 23 30.4% — — — — — 290 239 529 54.8% 79 67 146 54.1% 66 39 105 62.9% 26 20 46 56.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 181/200 of Kurumi Nara's and 512/705 of Daniela Hantuchova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Kurumi Nara Daniela Hantuchova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2009 2/2 0.0 6.0 64.4% 53.1% 26.3% 39.6% 57.1% 43.8% 40.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2010 6/8 0.2 5.2 59.3% 45.6% 37.8% 40.2% 43.8% 42.2% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2011 5/5 0.0 3.8 67.2% 51.3% 33.4% 46.3% 53.8% 46.8% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2012 4/4 1.0 1.3 69.4% 54.6% 40.3% 44.0% 63.8% 50.0% 43.3% 2003 7/49 2.1 2.6 61.5% 62.8% 53.0% 46.0% 45.9% 59.1% 46.5%
21 2013 11/11 0.8 1.6 73.5% 56.2% 50.9% 50.6% 51.9% 54.9% 45.9% 2004 8/50 2.6 3.0 59.5% 62.1% 44.2% 43.0% 64.2% 55.1% 40.9%
22 2014 40/44 0.4 2.0 74.4% 54.1% 45.8% 51.6% 49.3% 51.9% 44.6% 2005 15/63 4.0 3.2 58.2% 69.2% 46.3% 50.6% 45.0% 59.1% 47.9%
23 2015 31/41 0.4 2.5 73.2% 57.8% 49.3% 49.8% 50.8% 55.5% 39.5% 2006 42/60 3.4 2.7 63.8% 66.1% 44.7% 56.1% 46.8% 58.5% 42.5%
24 2016 32/33 0.6 2.5 70.0% 56.4% 47.0% 55.2% 50.1% 53.8% 45.3% 2007 74/78 3.5 2.6 65.4% 68.4% 47.9% 58.5% 49.2% 61.2% 45.2%
25 2017 25/26 0.5 2.4 67.5% 55.1% 44.4% 45.2% 50.1% 51.5% 45.8% 2008 36/42 2.1 2.2 64.4% 64.5% 45.8% 57.0% 50.2% 57.8% 43.5%
26 2018 13/14 0.6 3.6 65.3% 57.2% 43.1% 51.9% 39.6% 52.2% 40.9% 2009 57/61 2.4 2.4 63.3% 63.3% 46.3% 49.7% 49.1% 57.1% 43.5%
27 2019 6/6 0.5 3.0 68.3% 51.3% 37.7% 40.9% 47.3% 46.4% 40.8% 2010 49/56 2.7 2.6 64.9% 64.3% 46.9% 52.9% 49.4% 58.1% 43.8%
28 2020 1/1 0.0 3.0 75.6% 44.1% 9.1% 40.0% — 35.6% 30.6% 2011 64/66 3.2 2.6 62.8% 65.9% 49.7% 59.9% 47.6% 59.8% 45.0%
29 2021 5/5 0.6 1.8 73.5% 58.6% 50.3% 59.8% 61.3% 56.2% 44.6% 2012 38/47 2.4 3.7 62.2% 63.6% 45.7% 53.2% 51.4% 56.9% 41.3%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 42/47 2.6 3.4 60.9% 63.1% 43.8% 50.7% 46.6% 55.7% 41.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 37/40 2.3 3.8 62.5% 61.8% 44.7% 51.5% 43.1% 55.5% 41.5%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 32/34 2.1 3.9 66.6% 62.2% 47.7% 44.5% 46.3% 57.3% 39.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 9/10 2.4 3.4 60.6% 53.1% 39.7% 35.1% 52.9% 48.3% 38.7%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 2/2 3.0 5.5 65.7% 66.4% 37.9% 50.0% 39.2% 56.7% 41.9%
Career — 181/200 0.5 2.5 70.6% 55.3% 45.2% 50.0% 49.6% 52.2% 43.2% — 512/826 2.8 2.9 63.4% 64.6% 46.5% 53.3% 48.3% 58.0% 43.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kurumi Nara Daniela Hantuchova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1494 105.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.20
17 2009 1513 103.3 -1.75 -1.06 0.713 41.9% — — — 40.0% -1.40 1–0 1–0 — -0.11 2000 1550 115.3 — — — — +15 -2 — 44.8% -0.73 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 101.1 +0.04
18 2010 1476 98.7 -4.37 -1.09 0.701 41.1% +12 — — 22.2% -2.50 0–2 1–0 — -0.12 2001 1710 143.1 — — — — -61 -102 +42 55.0% +0.45 4–8 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 98.9 -1.24
19 2011 1457 101.1 -2.94 -3.05 0.705 42.2% +14 — — 27.3% -2.09 0–1 0–1 — -0.07 2002 1920 160.1 — — — — -36 -168 -31 63.3% +1.02 13–9 (59%) 10–4 (71%) 108.1 +1.09
20 2012 1438 97.8 -2.77 -1.44 0.865 46.7% +5 — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.46 2003 1752 137.7 +1.71 +1.73 1.137 52.9% +26 +6 +110 50.9% -0.12 9–5 (64%) 12–5 (71%) 106.4 +2.36
21 2013 1506 115.4 -0.68 +0.75 1.017 50.5% +3 — — 48.0% 0.00 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 101.8 +0.12 2004 1710 131.4 +0.32 -0.58 0.910 48.4% +1 -22 +176 46.7% -0.17 11–6 (65%) 9–8 (53%) 103.9 -0.74
22 2014 1651 131.7 -2.79 +0.83 0.929 48.5% -9 -46 -88 47.8% -0.22 6–4 (60%) 4–4 (50%) 103.8 -0.56 2005 1863 153.2 +2.43 +2.83 1.170 53.1% +26 -199 -56 56.1% +0.53 13–6 (68%) 6–8 (43%) 103.6 -0.05
23 2015 1586 116.1 -2.70 -1.45 0.888 48.0% +11 +13 -7 46.3% -0.40 7–8 (47%) 8–5 (62%) 101.2 +1.34 2006 1838 147.6 +2.67 -0.32 1.025 50.7% +7 -127 +7 54.0% +0.26 17–8 (68%) 8–4 (67%) 107.0 +0.07
24 2016 1603 118.7 -1.87 +0.71 0.980 49.6% +51 -63 -72 46.3% -0.24 4–3 (57%) 2–5 (29%) 97.2 +1.36 2007 1932 154.4 +5.20 +1.87 1.165 53.3% -6 -130 +1 63.3% +0.90 15–10 (60%) 14–4 (78%) 108.1 +2.67
25 2017 1577 120.0 -3.47 +1.47 0.945 48.6% +17 — -61 41.0% -0.61 4–5 (44%) 1–2 (33%) 99.0 +0.49 2008 1757 140.8 +2.10 -0.03 1.032 50.5% +2 — — 53.2% +0.13 6–6 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 97.7 +0.80
26 2018 1486 120.2 -1.58 -0.63 0.856 46.7% +12 — +28 17.6% -1.62 0–6 (0%) 1–1 — -0.93 2009 1809 138.5 +1.75 -0.25 1.015 50.3% -33 -39 +107 55.7% +0.39 18–9 (67%) 11–5 (69%) 106.6 +1.00
27 2019 1566 112.7 -4.94 -1.67 0.762 44.4% -3 — — 50.0% +0.17 2–0 0–1 — +0.08 2010 1782 145.6 +2.86 +0.69 1.046 51.1% -3 -1 +88 55.6% +0.57 10–10 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 95.2 -1.22
28 2020 1559 96.2 +1.91 -1.68 0.474 33.3% — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +0.07 2011 1791 150.0 +3.89 +1.34 1.119 52.5% -42 +70 +168 60.4% +0.95 11–10 (52%) 8–9 (47%) 99.6 -1.84
29 2021 1513 106.6 -0.17 -2.31 1.020 51.1% — +69 — 58.3% +0.42 1–1 0–1 — +0.54 2012 1692 138.5 +1.52 -0.83 0.958 49.3% +8 — +159 46.3% -0.01 12–6 (67%) 5–11 (31%) 98.0 -1.10
30 2022 1500 104.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1684 132.7 +0.51 -1.74 0.944 48.9% -14 +86 +204 48.1% +0.01 12–6 (67%) 5–8 (38%) 100.2 +1.34
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1571 119.0 -0.43 -1.17 0.933 48.4% -17 +164 +244 39.5% -0.75 5–4 (56%) 0–2 — +2.28
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1573 117.2 -0.30 -2.09 0.931 48.5% -5 +70 +227 43.0% -0.67 7–4 (64%) 8–4 (67%) 106.6 -0.22
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1514 111.4 -2.93 -2.64 0.748 43.7% -12 — +237 18.2% -2.18 0–2 1–1 — -0.58
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1527 110.5 -1.92 +0.79 0.967 49.2% — — — 40.0% +0.20 1–0 — — -0.21
Career — 1700 121.9 -2.51 -0.03 0.906 47.9% +14 -23 -39 42.2% -0.58 26–33 (44%) 21–21 (50%) 98.6 +1.34 — 1968 147.9 +2.22 +0.08 1.029 50.6% -7 -28 +111 53.5% +0.29 166–112 (60%) 112–90 (55%) 107.0 +0.52

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.