H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kurumi Nara vs Elena Bovina H2H: 1-0
Kurumi Nara holds a 1–0 lead over Elena Bovina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kurumi Nara leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kurumi Nara won the 2011 Kuala Lumpur third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 34
Right-Handed
155 cm / 5'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2011* | Kuala Lumpur | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Kurumi Nara | 6-3 6-3 | Elena Bovina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kurumi Nara | #246 | #32 | 1,412 | 1,700 | 82 | 116 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Elena Bovina | #777 | #14 | 1,758 | 1,960 | 127 | 110 | 53.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kurumi Nara | Elena Bovina | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #181 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #133 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2010 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #130 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #49 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #140 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #26 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2012 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #148 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #21 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2013 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #81 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #15 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2014 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #44 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #61 | 1,908 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2015 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #81 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1431 | 1,862 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2016 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #77 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #329 | 1,757 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2017 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #102 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #186 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2018 | 0–13 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #210 | 1,728 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2019 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #301 | 1,599 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2021 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #185 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |