H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Kurumi Nara vs Jing-Jing Lu H2H: 0-1
Jing-Jing Lu holds a 1–0 lead over Kurumi Nara in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jing-Jing Lu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jing-Jing Lu won the 2018 Nanchang third round 3-6 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 34
Right-Handed
155 cm / 5'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2018* | Nanchang | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Jing-Jing Lu | 3-6 6-2 6-4 | Kurumi Nara | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kurumi Nara | #246 | #32 | 1,412 | 1,700 | 82 | 116 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jing-Jing Lu | #797 | #159 | 365 | 1,550 | 4 | 13 | 23.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kurumi Nara | Jing-Jing Lu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #181 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #130 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #140 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #148 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #81 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #44 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #163 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #81 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #292 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #77 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #102 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 0–13 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #185 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |