H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Lara Arruabarrena vs Edina Gallovits Hall H2H: 1-0
Lara Arruabarrena holds a 1–0 lead over Edina Gallovits Hall in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lara Arruabarrena leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lara Arruabarrena won the 2012 Bogota semifinal 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 34
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 41
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2012* | Bogota | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Lara Arruabarrena | 6-4 6-3 | Edina Gallovits Hall | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lara Arruabarrena | #1,062 | #52 | 1,083 | 1,722 | 99 | 120 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Edina Gallovits Hall | — | — | — | 1,642 | 50 | 80 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lara Arruabarrena | Edina Gallovits Hall | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2011 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #170 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #79 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #102 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2014 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #88 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #86 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 13–14 | 48.1% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #66 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #84 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #82 | 1,573 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #155 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #220 | 1,508 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |