H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Lara Arruabarrena vs Mihaela Buzarnescu H2H: 0-2
Mihaela Buzarnescu holds a 2–0 lead over Lara Arruabarrena in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mihaela Buzarnescu leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mihaela Buzarnescu won the 2021 Cluj-Napoca 1 fourth round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 34
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 38
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2021* | Cluj-Napoca 1 | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Mihaela Buzarnescu | 6-3 7-5 | Lara Arruabarrena | Match data |
| Feb 22, 2018* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Mihaela Buzarnescu | 7-6(5) 6-1 | Lara Arruabarrena | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lara Arruabarrena | #1,062 | #52 | 1,083 | 1,722 | 99 | 120 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mihaela Buzarnescu | #798 | #20 | 2,068 | 1,872 | 58 | 63 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lara Arruabarrena | Mihaela Buzarnescu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2011 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #170 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2012 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #79 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #102 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2014 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #88 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2015 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #86 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2016 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #66 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2017 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #84 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2018 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #82 | 1,573 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2019 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #155 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #220 | 1,508 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #24 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #113 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #137 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #122 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #404 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 1 |