H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lara Arruabarrena vs Timea Bacsinszky H2H: 0-2
Timea Bacsinszky holds a 2–0 lead over Lara Arruabarrena in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Timea Bacsinszky leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Timea Bacsinszky won the 2016 Beijing second round 4-6 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 34
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 37
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2016 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Timea Bacsinszky | 4-6 6-4 6-1 | Lara Arruabarrena | Match data |
| May 26, 2015* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Timea Bacsinszky | 6-3 6-4 | Lara Arruabarrena | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lara Arruabarrena | #1,062 | #52 | 1,083 | 1,722 | 99 | 120 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Timea Bacsinszky | #941 | #9 | 3,157 | 1,933 | 161 | 137 | 54.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lara Arruabarrena | Timea Bacsinszky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2011 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #170 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #54 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #79 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #53 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #102 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #50 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2014 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #88 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #247 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2015 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #86 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2016 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #66 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2017 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #84 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #48 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2018 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #82 | 1,573 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 37–14 | 72.5% | #12 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2019 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #155 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 32–17 | 65.3% | #15 | 1,777 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #39 | 1,816 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #220 | 1,508 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #191 | 1,725 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #139 | 1,630 | 0 | 4 |