H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lara Arruabarrena vs Tsvetana Pironkova H2H: 1-0
Lara Arruabarrena holds a 1–0 lead over Tsvetana Pironkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lara Arruabarrena leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lara Arruabarrena won the 2014 Madrid second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 34
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BUL
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2014* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Lara Arruabarrena | 6-3 6-4 | Tsvetana Pironkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lara Arruabarrena | #1,062 | #52 | 1,083 | 1,722 | 99 | 120 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Tsvetana Pironkova | #1,170 | #31 | 1,805 | 1,770 | 169 | 222 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lara Arruabarrena | Tsvetana Pironkova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #86 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #64 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2011 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #170 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #95 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #79 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #44 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #102 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #97 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #88 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #35 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #86 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #46 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #66 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #42 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #84 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #108 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #82 | 1,573 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #38 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2019 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #155 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #59 | 1,633 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #64 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #220 | 1,508 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #165 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #136 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #252 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 |