H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Laura Siegemund vs Ana Bogdan H2H: 2-1
Laura Siegemund holds a 2–1 lead over Ana Bogdan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Laura Siegemund leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Laura Siegemund won the 2024 Adelaide fourth round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 33
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2024* | Adelaide | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Laura Siegemund | 6-4 7-5 | Ana Bogdan | Match data |
| Feb 21, 2023* | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Ana Bogdan | 7-5 6-3 | Laura Siegemund | Match data |
| May 2, 2018* | Rabat | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Laura Siegemund | 6-4 6-1 | Ana Bogdan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Siegemund | #87 | #27 | 1,630 | 1,828 | 143 | 152 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Ana Bogdan | #448 | #39 | 1,214 | 1,830 | 95 | 114 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Siegemund | Ana Bogdan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #150 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #130 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #76 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #98 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #98 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #31 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #113 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #69 | 1,792 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #56 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #113 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #69 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #75 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #114 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2020 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #51 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #448 | 1,608 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2021 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2022 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,652 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #86 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #80 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |